Article contents
A Cost Comparison Analysis for Screening and Vaccination of Hospital Personnel with High- and Low-Prevalence Hepatitis B Virus Antibodies in California
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2017
Abstract
We compared the cost of antibody screening and the projected cost for hepatitis B vaccination of antibody-negative individuals at hospitals with “high prevalence” and “low prevalence” rates for hepatitis B virus antibodies among their employees. The use of hepatitis B core antibody for screening and subsequent hepatitis B vaccination of antibody-negative personnel was most cost-effective for hospitals considered to have high prevalence for hepatitis B virus antibodies among its staff, although use of hepatitis B surface antibody in this setting only increased costs by 1.4%. In a hospital with low prevalence for hepatitis B virus antibodies among its staff, use of hepatitis B surface antibody and subsequent vaccination of antibody-negative individuals was the most cost-effective approach, while use of hepatitis B core antibody for the above purposes would have increased costs by 3.4%. The use of both hepatitis B surface antibody and core antibody in either setting followed by immunization was least economical, as costs were increased by 13% and 13.5% respectively.
We concluded that hepatitis B core antibody should be used for screening in hospitals with high prevalence for hepatitis B virus antibodies among employees while hepatitis B surface antibody be used for screening in hospitals with low prevalence for hepatitis B virus antibodies among employees. A prediction of high and low prevalence for hepatitis B virus antibodies in hospital personnel may be made by knowledge of the distribution in ethnicity of staff.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998
References
- 1
- Cited by