Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:07:16.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation of Hand Hygiene Compliance Measured by Direct Observation with Estimates Obtained from Product Usage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

Westyn Branch-Elliman ,
Graham M. Snyder ,
Aleah D. King ,
Linda M. Baldini ,
Kaitlyn M. Dooley ,
David S. Yassa  and
Sharon B. Wright
Westyn Branch-Elliman*
Affiliation:
VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, Massachusetts
Graham M. Snyder
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Plantation Health and Wellness, Plantation, Florida
Aleah D. King
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Linda M. Baldini
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Kaitlyn M. Dooley
Affiliation:
Plantation Health and Wellness, Plantation, Florida
David S. Yassa
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Sharon B. Wright
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Address correspondence to Westyn Branch-Elliman, VA Boston Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, West Roxbury, MA, 02132 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Improving compliance with hand hygiene is a cornerstone of infection prevention. However, data regarding practical methods for monitoring compliance are limited. We found that product use metrics have a moderate correlation with direct observation in ward settings and limited correlation in intensive care units.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:746–749

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 39 , Issue 6 , June 2018 , pp. 746 - 749
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. Portions of these data were presented at IDWeek 2014 on October 11, 2014, in Philadelphia, PA.

References

REFERENCES

1. Boyce, JM, Pittet, D, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America Hand Hygiene Task Force. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:S3–S40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Srigley, JA, Furness, CD, Baker, GR, Gardam, M. Quantification of the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance monitoring using an electronic monitoring system: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:974–980.Google Scholar
3. Srigley, JA, Lightfoot, D, Fernie, G, Gardam, M, Muller, MP. Hand hygiene monitoring technology: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2013;2:101.Google Scholar
4. Boyce, JM. Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: current perspectives from the USA. J Hosp Infect 2008;70(Suppl 1):2–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Marra, AR, Moura, DF Jr, Paes, AT, dos Santos, OF, Edmond, MB. Measuring rates of hand hygiene adherence in the intensive care setting: a comparative study of direct observation, product usage, and electronic counting devices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:796–801.Google Scholar
6. McGuckin, M, Waterman, R, Govednik, J. Hand hygiene compliance rates in the United States—a one-year multicenter collaboration using product/volume usage measurement and feedback. Am J Med Qual 2009;24:205–213.Google Scholar
7. Morgan, DJ, Pineles, L, Shardell, M, et al. Automated hand hygiene count devices may better measure compliance than human observation. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:955–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Filho, MA, Marra, AR, Magnus, TP, et al. Comparison of human and electronic observation for the measurement of compliance with hand hygiene. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:1188–1192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Hagel, S, Reischke, J, Kesselmeier, M, et al. Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:957–962.Google Scholar