Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:50:32.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuously active disinfectant inactivates severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and human coronavirus 229E two days after the disinfectant was applied and following wear exposures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

William A. Rutala*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Luisa A. Ikner
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Curtis J. Donskey
Affiliation:
Infectious Disease Section, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
David J. Weber
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Charles P. Gerba
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
*
Author for correspondence: William A. Rutala, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The surface environment in rooms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients may be persistently contaminated despite disinfection. A continuously active disinfectant demonstrated excellent sustained antiviral activity following a 48-hour period of wear and abrasion exposures with reinoculations. Reductions of >4-log10 were achieved within a 1-minute contact time for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the human coronavirus, 229E.

Type
Concise Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Hospital-room environmental surfaces and noncritical medical devices are frequently contaminated, and they serve as a source of healthcare pathogens including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although indirect transmission via fomites is not thought to be the primary way the virus spreads, the role of the contaminated healthcare environment in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among patients and/or healthcare personnel remains unclear. In laboratory testing, SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to remain viable on surfaces for hours to days. Reference Doremalen, Bushmaker and Morris1 The surface environment in rooms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients may be persistently contaminated with SARS CoV-2 RNA despite routine room cleaning and disinfection. Reference Kanamori, Weber and Rutala2

We recently reported on a novel continuously active disinfectant against pathogens causing healthcare-associated infections [eg, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp (VRE), Candida auris] and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) [eg, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae]. Reference Rutala, Gergen, Sickbert-Bennett, Anderson and Weber3,Reference Redmond, Cadnum and Silva4 The application of this continuously active disinfectant on portable equipment resulted in significant reductions in aerobic colony counts over 7 days, and in lower recoveries of S. aureus and enterococci. Reference Redmond, Cadnum and Silva4 In the present study, we evaluated the residual efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant that is registered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to kill SARS-CoV-2 and human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) on surfaces for 48 hours.

Methods

We investigated the continuously active disinfectant against HCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 using the EPA Protocol #01-1A “Protocol for Residual Self-Sanitizing Activity of Dried Chemical Residuals on Hard, Non-Porous Surfaces,” with modifications for viruses. 5 The method simulates dry and wet wiping by incorporating “wear” of the test surface as well as reinoculations of the test and control surfaces over a period of at least 24 hours following product application. Glass surfaces (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm) were initially inoculated with ≥5-log10 of virus per carrier, treated with the novel disinfectant (3 sprays, 15.25–20.3 cm from the surface), and allowed to dry overnight. The carriers were abraded using a standardized abrasion machine (Gardco Model D10V, Paul N. Gardner Co, Pompano Beach, FL) under multiple alternating dry and wet wiping conditions (6 dry cycles, 6 wet cycles, total 12 cycles [2 passes per cycle = 24 passes] interspersed with 6 reinoculations with ≥3-log10 of the test pathogen. The mean log10 viral titer of the initial viral inoculum volume per carrier (0.010 mL) for SARS-CoV-2 was 5.67 ± 0.17, and the reinoculation titers were 3.67 ± 0.17 on day 1 and 3.92 ± 0.09 on day 2 (n = 2). The mean log10 viral titer of the initial viral inoculum volume per carrier (0.010 mL) for HCoV-229E was 5.63 ± 0.18, and the reinoculation titers were 4.00 ± 0.35 and 3.75 ± 0.00 on day 1 and day 2 (n = 2), respectively. After the 48-hour period of wear exposures, the surfaces were reinoculated with ≥5-log10 of virus to assess the sanitizing efficacy of the continuously active disinfectant to kill >99.9% following a 1-minute contact time. All viral preparations were prepared with fetal bovine serum to achieve a 5% organic soil load. Carriers were neutralized using 1 mL Letheen broth base (Neogen, Lansing, MI) followed by immediate passage through a Sephadex G-10 gel filter column via centrifugation (3,500 ×g for 5 minutes).

Human coronavirus 229E (ATCC VR-740), an enveloped respiratory virus, was procured from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Propagation and assay of HCoV-229E was performed using the human lung fibroblast MRC-5 cell line (ATCC CCL-171). The SARS-CoV-2 isolate USA-WA1/2020 was deposited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and was obtained through BEI Resources, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the National Institutes of Health. SARS-CoV-2 (BEI NR-52281) was propagated and assayed using the Vero E6 cell line (ATCC CRL-1586). HCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 viral stocks were enumerated on their respective host cell lines seeded into 96-well cell culture trays using the TCID50 technique.

The continuously active disinfectant is EPA-registered as Firebird F130 (Microban Products, Huntersville, NC) and is marketed as Sani-24 by Professional Disposable International (Woodcliff Lake, NJ). The product has a disinfectant claim against 32 microorganisms and a residual claim against 5 bacteria.

Results and Discussion

The continuously active disinfectant studied demonstrated excellent sustained antiviral activity (>4.0-log10 reduction) within 1 minute against human coronavirus 229E and SARS-CoV-2 prepared with 5% organic soil following a 48-hour period of wear and abrasion exposures (Table 1). We detected no reduction in viral titer for the control.

Table 1. Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and the Human Coronavirus 229E by a Continuously Active Disinfectant Following a 48-Hour Period of Wear and Abrasion Exposures

Notes: Contact time = 1 minute; NA = not applicable.

Environmental contamination plays an important role in the transmission of several key healthcare-associated pathogens, including MRSA, VRE, and MDROs. Evidence in the literature supporting the role of the contaminated surface environment in the transmission of healthcare pathogens has been published. Reference Weber, Anderson and Rutala6 Many of the studies demonstrated that rooms are not adequately cleaned or disinfected, and patients admitted to a room previously occupied by a patient colonized or infected with a pathogen (eg, MRSA, VRE, Clostridioides difficile) have an increased likelihood of developing colonization or infection with that pathogen. Reference Carling7 To minimize this risk, improved terminal room decontamination (eg, supplemental ultraviolet disinfection following cleaning and disinfection) of contact precaution patient rooms has led to a decreased rate of infection in patients subsequently admitted to the room where the prior occupant was colonized or infected. Reference Anderson, Moehring and Weber8 However, the limitation of these “no touch” technologies is that currently they can only be used for terminal room disinfection (ie, not daily cleaning and disinfection) because they require removal of the patients, visitors, and healthcare personnel from the room.

Because routine cleaning and disinfection of room surfaces by environmental services is frequently inadequate Reference Carling7 and surfaces rapidly become recontaminated Reference Rutala, Kanamori, Gergen and Weber9 by patients, visitors, and staff, continuous room decontamination methods are being evaluated. Reference Rutala and Weber10 These findings highlight the potential to interrupt transmission from contaminated surfaces via healthcare provider’s hands by suboptimal compliance with hand hygiene or inappropriate glove use.

A continuously active disinfectant is a continuous room decontamination method. Reference Rutala and Weber10 That is, if an antimicrobial residue was left on a disinfected surface and it persists on the surface for ≥24 hours, it could reduce or eliminate the problem of continuous recontamination and minimize the role of environmental surfaces as reservoirs of pathogens by eliminating them on the treated surface. The intent of this technology is to make surfaces hygienically clean (not sterile), or free of pathogens in sufficient numbers to prevent human disease. In this study, we subjected a continuously active disinfectant to wear and abrasion exposures over 48 hours to assess residual antiviral efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E on surfaces for ≥24 hours.

Previous studies demonstrated persistent antimicrobial activity (ie, 3–5-log10 reduction) 24 hours after application for many healthcare pathogens within a contact time of 5 minutes. Reference Rutala, Gergen, Sickbert-Bennett, Anderson and Weber3,Reference Redmond, Cadnum and Silva4 In this study, we have demonstrated residual efficacy of the continuously active disinfectant to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E within 1 minute following 12 cycles of alternating dry and wet abrasions (6 dry and 6 wet) performed with reinoculations during the 48 hours after the product application. Based on our data using SARS-CoV-2 as well as studies with several common healthcare pathogens (eg, MRSA, VRE), continuously active disinfectants can significantly reduce bacterial, viral, and yeast populations that contact treated surfaces within 1–5 minutes over ≥24 hours. Reference Rutala, Gergen, Sickbert-Bennett, Anderson and Weber3,Reference Redmond, Cadnum and Silva4 If the microbial load on surfaces is pathogen free or pathogens are significantly reduced, the treated environmental surface will not act as a reservoir or source for pathogens (including SARS-CoV-2) linked to disease transmission.

Acknowledgments

None.

Financial support

This study was supported in part by Disinfectant Gift Trust Fund, Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology.

Conflicts of interest

Drs Rutala and Weber are consultants to Professional Disposables International (PDI). Dr Donskey has received research funding from Clorox and PDI.

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. This work was presented in part at the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) Conference held on October 6–10, 2020, in Denver, Colorado.

References

Doremalen, N, Bushmaker, T, Morris, D, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382:15641567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanamori, H, Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA. The role of the healthcare environment in SARS-CoV-2 transmission and potential control measures. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:20522061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutala, WA, Gergen, MF, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, Anderson, DJ, Weber, DJ, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program. Antimicrobial activity of a continuously active disinfectant against healthcare pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:12841286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redmond, SN, Cadnum, JL, Silva, SY, et al. Evaluation of a continuously active disinfectant for decontamination of portable medical equipment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protocol for residual self-sanitizing activity of dried chemical residuals on hard, nonporous surfaces. Environmental Protection Agency website. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/cloroxpcol_final.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2021.Google Scholar
Weber, DJ, Anderson, D, Rutala, WA. The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2013;26:338344.10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283630f04CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carling, P. Methods for assessing the adequacy of practice and improving room disinfection. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:S20S25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, DJ, Moehring, RW, Weber, DJ, et al. Effectiveness of targeted enhanced terminal room disinfection on hospital-wide acquisition and infection with multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile: a secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with crossover design (BETR Disinfection). Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:845853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutala, WA, Kanamori, H, Gergen, MF, Weber, DJ. Microbial assessment of recontamination with Acinetobacter in patient room environment in burn units. Am J Infect Control 2020;48 suppl:S20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. Disinfection and sterilization: An overview and current issues. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2021;35:575607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and the Human Coronavirus 229E by a Continuously Active Disinfectant Following a 48-Hour Period of Wear and Abrasion Exposures