Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:11:23.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorhexidine Resistance in Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Isolated From the Surfaces of Dispensers of Soap Containing Chlorhexidine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Steven E. Brooks ,
Mary A. Walczak ,
Rizwanullah Hameed  and
Patrick Coonan
Steven E. Brooks*
Affiliation:
Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Mary A. Walczak
Affiliation:
Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Rizwanullah Hameed
Affiliation:
Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Patrick Coonan
Affiliation:
Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
*
Department of Infection Control/Chief, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, 585 Schenectady Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bacterial contamination with pan-resistant Acinetobacter and Klebsiella, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was noted on the surfaces of dispensers of hand soap with 2% chlorhexidine. Gram-negative isolates could multiply in the presence of 1% chlorhexidine. In contrast, MRSA was inhibited in vitro by chlorhexidine at concentrations as low as 0.0019%.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 23 , Issue 11 , November 2002 , pp. 692 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sartor, C, Jacomo, V, Duvivier, C, Tissot-Dupont, H, Sambuc, R, Drancourt, M. Nosocomial Serratia marcescens infections associated with extrinsic contamination of a liquid nonmedicated soap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:196–199.Google Scholar
2.Kovacs, BJ, Aprecio, RM, Kettering, JD, Chen, YK. Efficacy of various disinfectants in killing a resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by comparing zones of inhibition: implications for endoscopic equipment reprocessing. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;11:2057–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Russell, AD. Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: present knowledge and future problems. J Hosp Infect 1999;43(suppl):S57–S68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Russell, AD. Plasmids and bacterial resistance to biocides. J Appl Microbiol 1997;83:155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Tattawasart, U, Maillard, JY, Furr, JR, Russell, AD. Development of resistance to chlorhexidine diacetate and cetylpyridinium chloride in Pseudomonas stutzeri and changes in antibiotic susceptibility. J Hosp Infect 1999;42:219–229.Google Scholar
6.McDonnell, G, Russell, AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:147–179.Google Scholar
7.Kampf, G, Jarosch, R, Ruden, H. Limited effectiveness of chlorhexidine based hand disinfectants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Hosp Infect 1998;38:297–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Goroncy-Bermes, P, Schouten, MA, Voss, A. In vitro activity of a nonmedicated handwash product, chlorhexidine, and an alcohol-based hand disinfectant against multiply resistant gram-positive microorganisms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:194–196.Google Scholar
9.Pittet, D. Improving compliance withjiand hygiene in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:381–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed