Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:11:06.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorhexidine Is Better than Aqueous Povidone Iodine as Skin Antiseptic for Preventing Surgical Site Infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Olivier Mimoz
Olivier Mimoz*
Affiliation:
Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, and INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 9 , September 2012 , pp. 961 - 962
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012 

References

1. Kamel, C, McGahan, L, Polisena, J, Mierzwinski-Urban, M, Embil, JM. Preoperative skin antiseptic preparations for preventing surgical site infections: a systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:608–617.10.1086/665723Google Scholar
2. Swenson, BR, Hedrick, TL, Metzger, R, Bonatti, H, Pruett, TL, Sawyer, RG. Effects of preoperative skin preparation on postoperative wound infection rates: a prospective study of 3 skin preparation protocols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:964–971.10.1086/605926Google Scholar
3. Noorani, A, Rabey, N, Walsh, SR, Davies, RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with Chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery. Br J Surg 2010;97:1614–1620.10.1002/bjs.7214Google Scholar
4. Lee, I, Agarwall, RK, Lee, BY, Fishman, NO, Umschied, CA. Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of Chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:1219–1229.10.1086/657134Google Scholar
5. Darouiche, RO, Wall, MJ Jr, Itani, KM, et al. Chlorhexidine alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:18–26.10.1056/NEJMoa0810988Google Scholar
6. Lee, I, Fishman, NO, Agarwal, RK, Lee, BY, Umscheid, CA. Reply to Maiwald et al and Riccio et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:406–408.10.1086/659255Google Scholar
7. Swenson, BR, Sawyer, RG. Importance of alcohol in skin preparation protocols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:977 10.1086/655843Google Scholar
8. Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo, R, Losa Iglesias, ME, Alou Cervera, L, Sevillano Fernández, D, Prieto Prieto, J. Preoperative skin and nail preparation of the foot: comparison of the efficacy of 4 different methods in reducing bacterial load. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:986–992.10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.045Google Scholar
9. Small, H, Adams, D, Casey, AL, Crosby, CT, Lambert, PA, Elliott, T. Efficacy of adding 2% (w/v) Chlorhexidine gluconate to 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to peripheral venous cannulation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:963–965.10.1086/590664Google Scholar