Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:46:13.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brief Report: The Utilization of Influencing Tactics for the Implementation of Infection Control Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2022

W.H. Seto ,
S.G. Ong ,
T.Y. Ching ,
S.H. Ng ,
Y.B. Chu ,
W.H. Yung  and
L.M. Ho
W.H. Seto*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong
S.G. Ong
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, University of Hong Kong
T.Y. Ching
Affiliation:
Infection Control Unit, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
S.H. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Management Studies, University of Hong Kong
Y.B. Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong
W.H. Yung
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong
L.M. Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, University of Hong Kong
*
Department of Microbiology., University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, New Pathology Building, Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the prevention of nosocomial infection, it is important to understand its epidemiology and pathogenesis. Only then are we able to formulate appropriate preventive methods for the various types of infection. However, in recent years there has been growing recognition that the implementation of preventive measures is often only possible when behavioral change occurs. In fact, an appreciation of behavioral change principles is critical for infection control nurses (ICNs) because most preventable nosocomial infections are related to inappropriate patient care practices. Procedures for prevention are often simple (e.g., washing hands), but compliance can be extremely difficult to enforce in the hospital.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , March 1990 , pp. 144 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Raven, BH, Haley, RW. Social influence in a medical context: hospital-acquired infections as a problem in medical social psychology. In: Bickman, L, ed. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publication; 1980:235–277.Google Scholar
2. Haley, RW, Garner, JS. Infection surveillance and control programs. In: Bennett, JV, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown & Co; 1986:39–50.Google Scholar
3. Raven, BH, Freeman, HE, Haley, RW. Social science perspective in hospital infection control. In: Johnson, AW, Grusky, O, Raven, BH, eds. Contemporary Health Services: A Social Science Perspective. Boston, Mass: Auburn House; 1981:139–175.Google Scholar
4. Raven, BH, Haley, RW. Social influence and compliance of hospital nurses with infection control policies. In: Eiser, RJ, ed. Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. Chichester, England: John Wiley; 1982:413–438.Google Scholar
5. French, JRP, Raven, BH. The Bases of Social Power. In: Cartwright, D, ed. Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan; 1959:150–167.Google Scholar
6. Goodchilds, JD, Quadrado, C, Raven, BH. Getting one's way. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Sacramento, Calif, April 1975.Google Scholar
7. Robbins, SF! Organizational Behaviour. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986:279–281.Google Scholar
8. Kipnis, D. The use of power in organizations and in interpersonal settings. In: Oskamp, S, ed. Applied Social Psychology Annual 5. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications; 1984:179–210.Google Scholar
9. Kipnis, D, Schmidt, SM. An influence perspective on bargaining within organizations. In: Bazerman, M, Lewicki, R, eds. Negotiating in Organizations. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications; 1983:303–319.Google Scholar
10. Kipnis, D, Schmidt, S, Wilkinson, I. Intraorganizational influence tactics: explorations in getting one's way. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65:440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kipnis, D, Schmidt, SM. Chris, S, et al. Patterns of managerial influence: shotgun managers, tacticians and bystanders. Organizational Dynamics 1984;12(3):58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Cattell, RB, Balcar, KR, Horn, JL, Nesselroade, JR. Factor matching procedures: an improvement of the S index; with tables. Education and Psychological Measurements. 1969;29:781–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Tabachnick, GG, Fidell, LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, New York: Harper & Row Publishers Inc; 1983:413–416.Google Scholar
14. Dawes, RM. Suppose we measured height with rating scales instead of rulers. Applied Psychological Measurements. 1977;1:267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Labovitz, S. The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. American Sociological Review. 1970;35:515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Manstead, ASR, Proffitt, C, Smart, JL. Predicting and understanding mothers' infant-feeding intentions and behaviour: testing the theory of reasoned action. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44:657–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Ajzen, I, Fishbein, M. Attitude-behavior relationship: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psycho1 Bull. 1977;84:888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar