Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:50:41.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brief Report: Needle Punctures—Documentation and Incidence Rate Calculation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Marlene Fishman*
Affiliation:
Departments of Nosocomial Infection and Risk Management, St. Joseph Hospital, Providence/North Providence, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Control, John E. Fogarty Memorial Hospital, North Smithfield, Rhode Island
Alan F. Cathers
Affiliation:
Departments of Nosocomial Infection and Risk Management, St. Joseph Hospital, Providence/North Providence, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Control, John E. Fogarty Memorial Hospital, North Smithfield, Rhode Island
Deborah Stamp
Affiliation:
Departments of Nosocomial Infection and Risk Management, St. Joseph Hospital, Providence/North Providence, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Control, John E. Fogarty Memorial Hospital, North Smithfield, Rhode Island
*
Department of Nosocomial Infection, St. Joseph Hospital, 21 Peace Street, Providence, RI 02907

Extract

Potential hazards of puncture wounds have been well-defined and include transmission of hepatitis B virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, syphilis, malaria, and other infectious diseases. Yet, standard methodology has not been used for statistical comparison. Attack rates have been expressed as needlesticks per full-time equivalents, needlesticks per employee per year, punctures per number of personnel, or punctures per number of hospital beds. These calculations do not account for the amount of time during which an employee is at risk of receiving a needle puncture. Also, numbers alone cannot account for intensity of care, potential exposures, or hours at risk. Nor can numbers provide an estimate of potential risk. A rate is more valuable than numbers because it measures the probability of occurrence. A meaningful incidence rate would be based on uniform data collection and would provide the number of puncture wounds per year for a standardized work period. This is similar in concept to nosocomial infections per patient-days of exposure. We propose the application of standard labor statistics methodology which accounts for man-hours worked, can be readily obtained in health care facilities, and can be modified as described here.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McCormick, RD Maki, DG: Epidemiology of needle-stick injuries in hospital personnel. Am J Med 1981; 70:928932.Google Scholar
2. Bock, KB, Tong, MJ, Bernstein, S: The risk of accidental exposure to hepatitis B virus via blood contamination in medical students. J Infect Dis 1981; 144:604.10.1093/infdis/144.6.604Google Scholar
3. Type B hepatitis after needle-stick exposure: Prevention with HBIG. Final report of the VA Cooperative Study. Ann Intern Med 1978; 88:285293.Google Scholar
4. Ruben, FL, Norden, CW, Rockwell, K, et al: Epidemiology of accidental needle-puncture wounds in hospital workers. Am J Med Sci 1983; 286:2630.Google Scholar
5. Reed, JS, Anderson, AC, Hodges, GR: Needlestick and puncture wounds: Definition of the problem. Am J Infect Control 1980; 8:101106.10.1016/S0196-6553(80)80002-2Google Scholar
6. Jacobson, JT, Burke, JP, Conti, MT: Injuries of hospital employees from needles and sharp objects. Infect Control 1983; 4:100102.Google Scholar
7. Evaluating Your Firm's Injury & Illness Record, Services Industries, 1978. Washington, DC, US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Report 592, April 1980.Google Scholar
8. Hamory, BH: Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital. Am J Infect Control 1983; 11:174177.10.1016/0196-6553(83)90077-9Google Scholar