Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:48:39.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barriers and facilitators to standardization of ultrasound use and probe disinfection in the ambulatory setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2020

Angela Ai
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
Laura Anderson
Affiliation:
UW Health, Madison, Wisconsin
Nasia Safdar
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans’ Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
Daniel Shirley*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
*
Author for correspondence: Daniel Shirley, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

To determine barriers and facilitators to standardization of ultrasound probe disinfection at ambulatory sites, we conducted observations and interviews of staff. Variability was noted in disinfection practices and in the use of protective equipment even for procedures with the potential for the probe to contact sterile tissues. Standardization is needed.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Improperly sterilized or HLD equipment—a growing problem. The Joint Commission website. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/joint-commission-online/qs_33a_2017pdf.pdf?db=web&hash=47765E337C78E309FCECC38C038B7B59. Published 2017. Accessed January 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Bancroft, EA, English, L, Terashita, D, Yasuda, L. Outbreak of Escherichia coli infections associated with a contaminated transesophageal echocardiography probe. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:11211123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akpochafor, MO, Eze, CU, Adeneye, SO, Ajekigbe, AT. Assessment of ultrasound equipment as a possible source of nosocomial infection in Lagos state hospitals and radio-diagnostic centres. Radiography 2015;21:154159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullaney, P, Munthali, P, Vlachou, P, Jenkins, D, Rathod, A, Entwisle, John. How clean is your probe? Microbiological assessment of ultrasound transducers in routine clinical use, and cost-effective ways to reduce contamination. Clin Radiol 2007;62:694698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutala, WA, Weber, D, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/disinfection-guidelines-H.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed January 20, 2020.Google Scholar
ANSI/AAMI ST58:2013 Chemical sterilization and high-level disinfection in healthcare facilities. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation website. http://my.aami.org/aamiresources/previewfiles/ST58_1308_preview.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed January 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Guidelines for cleaning and preparing external- and internal-use ultrasound probes between patients, safe handling, and use of ultrasound coupling gel. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine website. https://www.aium.org/accreditation/Guidelines_Cleaning_Preparing.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed January 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Carrico, RM, Furmanek, S, English, C. Ultrasound probe use and reprocessing: results from a national survey among US infection preventionists. Am J Infect Control 2018;46:913920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carayon, P.Schoofs Hundt, A, Karsh, BT, et al.Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:i50–i58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Ai et al. Supplementary Materials

Ai et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Ai et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 96.6 KB