Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:30:23.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The author replies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Dennis G. Maki
Dennis G. Maki*
Affiliation:
Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for Trauma and Life Support, University of Wisconsin Hospital Madison, Wisconsin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 15 , Issue 11 , November 1994 , pp. 685 - 686
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1994 

References

1. Maki, DG, Alvarado, CJ, Ringer, M. A prospective, randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 1991;338:339–343.10.1016/0140-6736(91)90479-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Raad, II, John, DC, Gilbreath, J, et al Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:231–238.10.2307/30145574CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Maki, DG. Yes, Virginia, aseptic technique is very important: maximal barrier precautions during insertion reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:227–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Mermel, LA, McCormick, RD, Springman, SR. Maki, DG. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters. A prospective study using molecular subtyping. Am J Med 1991;38:197S–205S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burke, JE Quinby, WC, Bondoc, CC, Sheehy, EM, Moreno, HC. The contribution of a bacterially isolated environment to the prevention of infection in seriously burned patients. Ann Surg 1977;186:377–387.10.1097/00000658-197709000-00016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Demling, RH, Perea, A, Maly, J, Moylan, JA, Jarrett, F Balish, E. The use of a laminar airflow isolation system for the treatment of major burns. Am J Surg 1978;136:375–378.10.1016/0002-9610(78)90298-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Shirani, KZ, McManus, AT, Vaughan, GM, McManus, WE, Pruitt, BA Jr, Mason, AD Jr. Effects of environment on infection in bum patients. Arch Surg 1986;121:31–36.10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400010037003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Weinstein, RA, Kabins, SA. Strategies for prevention and control of multiple drug-resistant nosocomial infection. Am J Med 1989;70:449–454.10.1016/S0002-9343(81)80001-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Klein, BS, Perloff, WH, Maki, DG. Reduction of nosocomial infection during pediatric intensive care by protective isolation. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1714–1721.10.1056/NEJM198906293202603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed