Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:22:32.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association between Contact Precautions and Delirium at a Tertiary Care Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Hannah R. Day*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Eli N. Perencevich
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa Iowa City Veterans Affairs, Iowa City, Iowa
Anthony D. Harris
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland
Ann L. Gruber-Baldini
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Seth S. Himelhoch
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Clayton H. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland
Emily Dotter
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Daniel J. Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland
*
685 West Baltimore Street, MSTF 334, Baltimore, MD 21201 ([email protected])

Abstract

Objective.

To investigate the relationship between contact precautions and delirium among inpatients, adjusting for other factors.

Design.

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting.

A 662-bed tertiary care center.

Patients.

All nonpyschiatric adult patients admitted to a tertiary care center from 2007 through 2009.

Methods.

Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the association between contact precautions and delirium in a retrospective cohort of 2 years of admissions to a tertiary care center.

Results.

During the 2-year period, 60,151 admissions occurred in 45,266 unique nonpsychiatric patients. After adjusting for comorbid conditions, age, sex, intensive care unit status, and length of hospitalization, contact precautions were significantly associated with delirium (as denned by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision), medication, or restraint exposure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.24–1.51]). The association between contact precautions and delirium was seen only in patients who were newly placed under contact precautions during the course of their stay (adjusted OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.60–1.92]; P< .01) and was not seen in patients who were already under contact precautions at admission (adjusted OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.86–1.09]; P = .60).

Conclusions.

Although delirium was more common in patients who were newly placed under contact precautions during the course of their hospital admission, delirium was not associated with contact precautions started at hospital admission. Patients newly placed under contact precautions after admission but during hospitalization appear to be at a higher risk and may benefit from proven delirium-prevention strategies.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(1):34-39

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV. DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.Google Scholar
2. Liptzin, B. Clinical diagnosis and management of delirium. In: Stoudemire, A, Fogel, BS, Greenberg, DB, eds. Psychiatric Care of the Medical Patient. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000:581596.Google Scholar
3. Maldonado, JR. Delirium in the acute care setting: characteristics, diagnosis and treatment. Crit Care Clin 2008;24:657722.Google Scholar
4. Trzepacz, PT. Delirium advances in diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996;19:429448.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Muto, CA, Jernigan, JA, Ostrowsky, BE, et al. SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:362386.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:S65S164.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Day, HR, Perencevich, EN, Harris, AD, et al. Do contact precautions cause depression? a two-year study at a tertiary care medical centre. J Hosp Infect 2011;79:103107.Google Scholar
8. Jain, R, Kralovic, SM, Evans, ME, et al. Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 2011;364:14191430.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Morgan, DJ, Diekema, DJ, Sepkowitz, K, Perencevich, EN. Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: a review of the literature. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:8593.Google Scholar
10. Saint, S, Higgins, LA, Nallamothu, BK, Chenoweth, C. Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequendy? a brief report. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:354356.Google Scholar
11. Stelfox, HT, Bates, DW, Redelmeier, DA. Safety of patients isolated for infection control. JAMA 2003;290:18991905.Google Scholar
12. McCusker, J, Cole, M, Abrahamowicz, M, Han, L, Podoba, JE, Ramman-Haddad, L. Environmental risk factors for delirium in hospitalized older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:13271334.Google Scholar
13. Mody, L. Infection control issues in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 2007;23:499514.Google ScholarPubMed
14. McGregor, JC, Kim, PW, Perencevich, EN, et al. Utility of the chronic disease score and Charlson comorbidity index as comorbidity measures for use in epidemiologic studies of antibiotic-resistant organisms. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:483493.Google Scholar
15. Osih, RB, McGregor, JC, Rich, SE, et al. Impact of empiric antibiotic therapy on outcomes in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:839844.Google Scholar
16. McGregor, JC, Perencevich, EN, Furuno, JP, et al. Comorbidity risk-adjustment measures were developed and validated for studies of antibiotic-resistant infections. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:12661273.Google ScholarPubMed
17. Furuno, JP, Harris, AD, Wright, MO, et al. Value of performing active surveillance cultures on intensive care unit discharge for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:666670.Google ScholarPubMed
18. Furuno, JP, Perencevich, EN, Johnson, JA, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci co-colonization. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:15391544.Google Scholar
19. Harris, AD, Furuno, JP, Roghmann, MC, et al. Targeted surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its potential use to guide empiric antibiotic therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:31433148.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Inouye, SK, Leo-Summers, L, Zhang, Y, Bogardus, ST Jr, Leslie, DL, Agostini, JV. A chart-based method for identification of delirium: validation compared with interviewer ratings using the confusion assessment method. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:312318.Google Scholar
21. Rubin, FH, Williams, JT, Lescisin, DA, Mook, WJ, Hassan, S, Inouye, SK. Replicating the hospital elder life program in a community hospital and demonstrating effectiveness using quality improvement methodology. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:969974.Google Scholar
22. Deyo, RA, Cherkin, DC, Ciol, MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613619.Google ScholarPubMed
23. Brown, S, Fitzgerald, M, Walsh, K. Delirium dichotomy: a review of recent literature. Contemp Nurse 2007;26:238247.Google Scholar
24. Inouye, SK, van Dyck, CH, Alessi, CA, Balkin, S, Siegal, AP, Horwitz, RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method—a new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:941948.Google ScholarPubMed
25. Hempenius, L, van Leeuwen, BL, van Asselt, DZB, et al. Structured analyses of interventions to prevent delirium. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011;26:441450.Google ScholarPubMed