No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Assessment of a Novel Approach to Evaluate the Outcome of Endoscope Reprocessing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Letters to the Editor
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004
References
1.
Sciortino, CV, Xia, EL, Mozee, A. Assessment of a novel approach to evaluate the outcome of endoscope reprocessing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2004;25:284–290.Google Scholar
2.
Mackett, D, Kessock-Philip, S, Bascomb, S, Easmon, CS. Evaluation of the Lumac kit for the detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence. J Clin Pathol
1982;35:107–110.Google Scholar
3.
Martin, ET, Cote, JA, Perry, LK, Martin, WJ. Clinical evaluation of the Lumac bioluminescence method for screening urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol
1985;22:19–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.
Temprano, GC, D'Aquino, M. What is the scope of bioluminescence in pharmaceutical clean rooms monitoring?
Boll Chim Farm
2003;142:274–276.Google Scholar
5.
Lee, J, Deininger, RA. Detection of E. coli in beach water within 1 hour using immuno-magnetic separation and ATP bioluminescence. Luminescence
2004;19:31–36.Google Scholar
6.
Schneider, DA, Gourse, RL. Relationship between growth rate and ATP concentration in Escherichia coli: a bioassay for available cellular ATP. J Biol Chem
2004;279:8262–8268.Google Scholar
You have
Access