Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:03:16.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing effectiveness of cleaning and disinfection of equipment and environmental surfaces in cystic fibrosis clinics using an ATP assay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Marianne S. Muhlebach
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Marsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Thomas Shields
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Kushal K. Shah
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Maria Ansar
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Isabel Virella-Lowell
Affiliation:
Dept. of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
Juyan J. Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
John J. LiPuma
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Lisa Saiman*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Department of Infection Prevention & Control, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
*
Corresponding author: Lisa Saiman; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Infection control guidelines for cystic fibrosis (CF) stress cleaning of environmental surfaces and patientcare equipment in CF clinics. This multicenter study measured cleanliness of frequently touched surfaces in CF clinics using an ATP bioluminescence assay to assess the effectiveness of cleaning/disinfection and the impact of feedback.

Methods:

Eight surfaces were tested across 19 clinics (10 pediatric, 9 adult) over 5 rounds of testing. Rounds 1 and 2 served as uncleaned baseline, and Round 3 occurring after routine cleaning. Rounds 4 and 5 were performed after feedback provided to staff and measured after cleaning. Pass rates defined as <250 relative light units were the primary outcome.

Results:

Of the 750 tests performed, 72% of surfaces passed at baseline, and 79%, 83%, and 85% of surfaces passed in Rounds 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The overall pass-rate was significantly higher in adult compared to pediatric clinics (86% vs 71%; P < 0.001). In pediatric clinics, blood pressure equipment and computer keyboards in the pulmonary function lab consistently passed, but the exam room patient/visitor chairs consistently failed in all rounds. In adult clinics blood pressure equipment, keyboards in exam rooms and exam tables passed in all rounds and no surface consistently failed.

Conclusion:

We demonstrate the feasibility of an ATP bioluminescence assay to measure cleanliness of patient care equipment and surfaces in CF clinics. Pass rates improved after cleaning and feedback for certain surfaces. We found that surfaces are more challenging to keep clean in clinics taking care of younger patients.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Preliminary data has been presented at the North American Cystic Fibrosis conference in November 2023 in Phoenix, AZ. USA.

References

Saiman, L, Siegel, JD, LiPuma, JJ, et al. Infection prevention and control guideline for cystic fibrosis: 2013 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;1:S1S67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, et al. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:678–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nante, N, Ceriale, E, Messina, G, et al. Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review. J Prev Med Hyg 2017;58:E177e183.Google ScholarPubMed
Salsgiver, E, Bernstein, D, Simon, MS, et al. Comparing the bioburden measured by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) luminescence technology to contact plate-based microbiologic sampling to assess the cleanliness of the patient care environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:622624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, A, Dunn, AN, Fox, J, et al. Monitoring the effectiveness of daily cleaning practices in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting using an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay. Am J Infect Control 2020;48:757760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T, Griffith, C, Gallo, M, et al. A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2008;69:156–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3M, Clean, and Trace. Hygiene management system, hygiene management guide for environmental surfaces. [cited 2022; Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1840682O/3m-cleantrace-hygiene-management-system-for-environmental-surfaces.pdf. Accessed January 2024.Google Scholar
Hota, B Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection? Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1182–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, BG, McDonagh, J, Dancer, SJ, et al. Risk of organism acquisition from prior room occupants: An updated systematic review. Infect Dis Health 2023;28:290297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, JB, Zuaro, DE, Prato, BS, et al. Bacterial contamination of cystic fibrosis clinics. J Cyst Fibros 2009;8:186–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, R, Pannaraj, PS, Agopian, J, et al. Survival and transmission of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from fomites. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:219–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuczewski, E, Henaff, L, Regard, A, et al. Bacterial Cross-Transmission between Inanimate Surfaces and Patients in Intensive Care Units under Real-World Conditions: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:9401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festini, F, Buzzetti, R, Bassi, C, et al. Isolation measures for prevention of infection with respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2006;64:16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimakoff, J, Hoiby, N, Rosendal, K, et al. Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and the role of contamination of the environment in a cystic fibrosis clinic. J Hosp Infect 1983;4:3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, TJ, Ramsay, KA, Hu, H, et al. Shared Pseudomonas aeruginosa genotypes are common in Australian cystic fibrosis centres. Eur Respir J 2013;41:1091–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stapleton, PJ, Izydorcyzk, C, Clark, S, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain-sharing in early infection among children with cystic fibrosis. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73:e2521e2528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoiby, N, Pedersen, SS. Estimated risk of cross-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Danish cystic fibrosis patients. Acta Paediatr Scand 1989;78:395404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiehlmann, L, Cramer, N, Ulrich, J, et al. Effective prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infection at a cystic fibrosis centre - results of a 10-year prospective study. Int J Med Microbiol 2012;302:6977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, O, Jadkauskaite, L, Shafi, NT, et al. Microbiological evaluation of UV disinfection effectiveness in a specialist cystic fibrosis clinic. J Cyst Fibros 2019;18:e37e39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch-Elliman, W, Robillard, E, McCarthy, G, et al. Direct feedback with the ATP luminometer as a process improvement tool for terminal cleaning of patient rooms. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:195–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, EK, Salsgiver, EL, Bernstein, DA, et al. Sustained improvement in hospital cleaning associated with a novel education and culture change program for environmental services workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:10241029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, MJ, Babcock, HH, Welbel, SF, et al. Stopping Hospital Infections With Environmental Services (SHINE): A Cluster-randomized Trial of Intensive Monitoring Methods for Terminal Room Cleaning on Rates of Multidrug-resistant Organisms in the Intensive Care Unit. Clin Infect Dis 2022;75:12171223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, GS, Derry, C, Glasbey, T, et al. The perennial problem of variability in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests for hygiene monitoring within healthcare settings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:658–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sciortino, CV, Giles, RA. Validation and comparison of three adenosine triphosphate luminometers for monitoring hospital surface sanitization: a Rosetta Stone for adenosine triphosphate testing. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:e2339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omidbakhsh, N, Ahmadpour, F, Kenny, N. How reliable are ATP bioluminescence meters in assessing decontamination of environmental surfaces in healthcare settings? PLoS One 2014;9:e99951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G, Smyth, D, Singleton, J, et al. The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:617–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulvey, D, Redding, P, Robertson, C, et al. Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:2530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huslage, K, Rutala, WA, Sickbert-Bennett, E, et al. A quantitative approach to defining “high-touch” surfaces in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:850–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, RA Epidemiology and control of nosocomial infections in adult intensive care units. Am J Med 1991;91:179S184S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muhlebach, MS, Cunningham, F, LiPuma, JJ, et al. Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on cystic fibrosis centres and care: survey results from US centres. ERJ Open Res 2021;7:00249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Muhlebach et al. supplementary material

Muhlebach et al. supplementary material
Download Muhlebach et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.4 KB