Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:41:21.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antiretroviral Drug Resistance in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Source Patients for Occupational Exposures to Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Elise M. Beltrami
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Rachanee Cheingsong
Affiliation:
Division of AIDS, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Walid M. Heneine
Affiliation:
Division of AIDS, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Richard A. Respess
Affiliation:
Division of AIDS, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Jean G. Orelien
Affiliation:
Analytical Sciences, Inc., Durham, North Carolina
Meryl H. Mendelson
Affiliation:
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
Mari A. Stewart
Affiliation:
University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California
Brian S. Koll
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
Carol A. Sulis
Affiliation:
Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Denise M. Cardo*
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Mailstop E-68, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the prevalence of HIV antiretroviral resistance among source patients for occupational HIV exposures.

Design:

Blood and data (eg, stage of HIV, previous antiretroviral drug therapy, and HIV RNA viral load) were collected from HIV-infected patients who were source patients for occupational exposures.

Setting:

Seven tertiary-care medical centers in five U.S. cities (San Diego, California; Miami, Florida; Boston, Massachusetts; Albany, New York; and New York, New York [three sites]) during 1998 to 1999.

Participants:

Sixty-four HIV-infected patients who were source patients for occupational exposures.

Results:

Virus from 50 patients was sequenced; virus from 14 patients with an undetectable (ie, < 400 RNA copies/mL) viral load could not be sequenced. Overall, 19 (38%) of the 50 patients had primary eenotypic mutations associated with resistance to reverse transcriptase or protease inhibitors. Eighteen of the 19 viruses with primary mutations and 13 wild type viruses were phenotyped by recombinant assays; 19 had phenotypic resistance to at least one antiretroviral agent. Of the 50 source patients studied, 26 had taken antiretroviral agents in the 3 months before the occupational exposure incident. Sixteen (62%) of the 26 drug-treated patients had virus that was phenotypically resistant to at least one drug. Four (17%) of 23 untreated patients had phenotypically resistant virus. No episodes of HIV transmission were observed among the exposed HCWs.

Conclusions:

There was a high prevalence of drug-resistant HIV among source patients for occupational HIV exposures. Healthcare providers should use the drug treatment information of source patients when making decisions about postexposure prophylaxis.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR 2001;50(RR11):152.Google Scholar
2.Hirsch, MS, Brun-Vézinet, F, D'Aquila, RT, et al.Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adult HIV-1 infection: recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA panel. JAMA 2000;283:24172426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Lot, F, Abiteboul, D. Occupational HIV infection in France. Presented at the 4th Annual International Conference on Occupational Health for Health Care Workers; September 28-October 1, 1999; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Abstract WP-25.Google Scholar
4.Perdue, B, Wolde Rufael, D, Mellors, J, Quinn, T, Margolick, J. HIV-1 transmission by a needlestick injury despite rapid initiation of fourdrug postexposure prophylaxis. Presented at the 6th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; January 31-February 4, 1999; Chicago, IL. Abstract 210.Google Scholar
5.Beltrami, EM, Luo, C-C, de la Torre, N, Cardo, DM. Transmission of drug-resistant HIV after an occupational exposure despite postexposure prophylaxis with a combination drug regimen. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:345348.Google Scholar
6.Tack, PC, Bremer, JW, Harris, AA, Landay, AL, Kessler, HA, Kuritzkes, DR. Genotypic analysis of HIV-1 isolates to identify antiretroviral resistance mutations from source patients involved in health care worker occupational exposures. JAMA 1999;281:10851086. Letter.Google Scholar
7.Mehta, CR, Patel, N. Exact logistic regression: theory and examples. Stat Med 1995;14:21432160.Google Scholar
8.Roland, ME, Martin, JN, Grant, RM, et al. Who is the source of HIV exposure in the San Francisco Post-Exposure Prevention (PEP) Project? Presented at the 7th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; January 30-February 2, 2000; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 197.Google Scholar
9.Weinstock, H, Respess, R, Heneine, W, et al.Prevalence of mutations associated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 seroconverters in the United States, 1992-1998. J Infect Dis 2000;182:330333.Google Scholar
10.Boden, D, Hurley, A, Zhang, L, et al.HIV-1 drug resistance in newly infected individuals. JAMA 1999;282:11351141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Brodine, SK, Shaffer, RA, Starkey, MJ, et al.Drug resistance patterns, genetic subtypes, clinical features, and risk factors in military personnel with HIV-1 seroconversion. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:502506.Google Scholar
12.Leigh-Brown, AJ, Precious, HM, Whitcomb, JM, et al.Reduced susceptibility of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV 1) from patients with primary HIV infection to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is associated with variation at novel amino acid sites. J Virol 2000;74:1026910273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Quinn, TC, Wawer, MJ, Sewankambo, N, et al.Viral load and heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. N Engl J Med 2000;342:921929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Ragni, MV, Faruki, H, Kingsley, LA. Heterosexual HIV-1 transmission and viral load in hemophilic patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1998;7:4245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Hisada, M, O'Brien, TR, Rosenberg, PS, Goedert, JJ. Virus load and risk of heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus by men with hemophilia. J Infect Dis 2000;181:14751478.Google Scholar
16.Pedraza, MA, del Romero, J, Roldan, F, et al.Heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 is associated with high plasma viral load levels and a positive viral isolation in the infected partner. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1999;21:120125.Google Scholar
17.Mofenson, LM, Lambert, JS, Stiehm, ER, et al.Risk factors for perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in women treated with zidovudine. N Engl J Med 1999;341:385393.Google Scholar
18.Garcia, PM, Kalish, LA, Pitt, J, et al.Maternal levels of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA and the risk of perinatal transmission. N Engl J Med 1999;341:394402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Dickover, RE, Garratty, EM, Herman, SA, et al.Identification of levels of maternal HIV-1 RNA associated with risk of perinatal transmission: effect of maternal zidovudine treatment on viral load. JAMA 1996;275:599605.Google Scholar
20.Eastman, PS, Shapiro, DE, Coombs, RW, et al.Maternal viral genotypic zidovudine resistance and infrequent failure of zidovudine therapy to prevent perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076. J Infect Dis 1998;177:557564.Google Scholar
21.Blanche, S, Rouzioux, C, Mandelbrot, L, Delfraissy, JF, Mayaux, MJ. Zidovudine-lamivudine for prevention of mother to child HIV-1 transmission. Presented at the 6th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; January 31-February 4, 1999; Chicago, IL. Abstract 267.Google Scholar
22.Devereux, HL, Youle, M, Johnson, MA, Loveday, C. Rapid decline in detectability of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations after stopping therapy. AIDS 1999;13:F123F127.Google Scholar
23.Verhofsted, C, Van Wanzeele, F, Van Der Gucht, B, De Cabooter, N, Plum, J. Interruption of reverse transcriptase inhibitors or a switch from reverse transcriptase to protease inhibitors resulted in a fast reappearance of virus strains with a reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sensitive genotype. AIDS 1999;13:25412546.Google Scholar