Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:18:19.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of the Health Belief Model to Study Patient Perceptions of Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Acute Care Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Cydney Heid ,
Mary Jo Knobloch ,
Lucas T. Schulz  and
Nasia Safdar
Cydney Heid
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
Mary Jo Knobloch
Affiliation:
William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital Madison, Wisconsin
Lucas T. Schulz
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, Wisconsin
Nasia Safdar*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital Madison, Wisconsin
*
Address correspondence to Nasia Safdar, 5221 MFCB, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify themes associated with patient perceptions of antibiotic use and the role of patients in inpatient antimicrobial stewardship.

DESIGN

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 hospitalized patients using the Health Belief Model as the framework for questions and analysis.

SETTING

An academic tertiary care hospital in Madison, Wisconsin.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 30 general medicine inpatients receiving at least 1 anti-infective medication were interviewed.

RESULTS

Participants recognized antibiotic resistance as a serious public health threat but expressed low perceived susceptibility to being personally affected by antibiotic resistance. Views of susceptibility were influenced by a high degree of trust in physicians and misperceptions regarding the mechanisms underlying resistance. Participants expressed high self-efficacy and a desire to be involved in their health care. Perceived roles for patients in preventing the inappropriate use of antibiotics ranged from asking questions and speaking up about concerns to active involvement in decision making regarding antibiotic treatments. Few participants reported being offered the opportunity to engage in such shared decision making while hospitalized.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest an important role for patients in improving antibiotic use in hospitals. However, patient engagement has not been recognized as a critical component of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Our study suggests that the likelihood of patient engagement in stewardship practices is currently limited by low perceived susceptibility and lack of cues to act. Further investigation into how patients may be engaged as good stewards of antibiotics may reveal new ways to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in the inpatient setting.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:576–582

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , May 2016 , pp. 576 - 582
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. WHO, Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance 2014. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2014.Google Scholar
2. Belongia, EA, Knobloch, MJ, Kieke, BA, Davis, JP, Janette, C, Besser, RE. Impact of statewide program to promote appropriate antimicrobial drug use. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:912–920.Google Scholar
3. Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/healthcare/implementation/core-elements.html. Accessed May 4, 2015.Google Scholar
4. Get Smart program. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart. Published 2014. Accessed May 4, 2015.Google Scholar
5. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. Infection Control Hosp Epidemiol, 33:322–327.Google Scholar
6. Fact sheet: Obama administration releases national action plan to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria [news release]. The White House Office of the Press Secretary website. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/27/fact-sheet-obama-administration-releases-national-action-plan-combat-ant. Published 2015. Accessed September 8, 2015.Google Scholar
7. Prey, JE, Woollen, J, Wilcox, L, et al. Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:742–750.Google Scholar
8. Isaacs, CG, Kistler, C, Hunold, KM, et al. Shared decision-making in the selection of outpatient analgesics for older individuals in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:793–798.Google Scholar
9. Nota, I, Drossaert, CHC, Taal, E, Vonkeman, HE, Van De Laar, MAFJ. Patient participation in decisions about disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskel Disord 2014:1–10.Google Scholar
10. Mistler, LA, Drake, RE. Shared decision making in antipsychotic management. J Psychiatr Pract 2008;14:333–344.Google Scholar
11. Bishop, AC, Baker, GR, Boyle, TA, MacKinnon, NJ. Using the Health Belief Model to explain patient involvement in patient safety. Heal Expect 2014, Oct 10 [epub].Google Scholar
12. Carpenter, CJ. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun 2010;25:661–669.Google Scholar
13. Pope, SD, Dellit, TH, Owens, RC, Hooton, TM. Results of survey on implementation of Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:97–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Müller, E, Zill, JM, Dirmaier, J, Härter, M, Scholl, I. Assessment of trust in physician: a systematic review of measures. PLoS One 2014;9:e106844.Google Scholar
15. Chawla, N, Arora, NK. Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: Lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust? J Cancer Surviv 2013;7:592–601.Google Scholar
16. Kraetschmer, N, Sharpe, N, Urowitz, S, Deber, RB. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Heal Expect 2004;7:317–326.Google Scholar
17. Brookes-Howell, L, Elwyn, G, Hood, K, et al. “The body gets used to them”: patients’ interpretations of antibiotic resistance and the implications for containment strategies. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:766–772.Google Scholar
18. Davey, P, Pagliari, C, Hayes, A. The patient’s role in the spread and control of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Clin Microbial Infect 2002;8(Suppl 2):43–68.Google Scholar
19. Gudnadottir, U, Fritz, J, Zerbel, S, Bernardo, A, Sethi, AK, Safdar, N. Reducing health care-associated infections: patients want to be engaged and learn about infection prevention. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:955–958.Google Scholar