Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:56:06.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure, Process, and Outcome Quality of Surgical Site Infection Surveillance in Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2017

Stefan P. Kuster ,
Marie-Christine Eisenring ,
Hugo Sax ,
Nicolas Troillet  and
Swissnoso
Stefan P. Kuster*
Affiliation:
Swissnoso - National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Marie-Christine Eisenring
Affiliation:
Swissnoso - National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland Service of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland
Hugo Sax
Affiliation:
Swissnoso - National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Nicolas Troillet
Affiliation:
Swissnoso - National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland Service of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland Services of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
*
Address correspondence to Stefan Kuster, MD, MSc, Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100 / HAL14 D6 8091 Zürich, Switzerland ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the structure and quality of surveillance activities and to validate outcome detection in the Swiss national surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance program.

DESIGN

Countrywide survey of SSI surveillance quality.

SETTING

147 hospitals or hospital units with surgical activities in Switzerland.

METHODS

Site visits were conducted with on-site structured interviews and review of a random sample of 15 patient records per hospital: 10 from the entire data set and 5 from a subset of patients with originally reported infection. Process and structure were rated in 9 domains with a weighted overall validation score, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the identification of SSI.

RESULTS

Of 50 possible points, the median validation score was 35.5 (range, 16.25–48.5). Public hospitals (P<.001), hospitals in the Italian-speaking region of Switzerland (P=.021), and hospitals with longer participation in the surveillance (P=.018) had higher scores than others. Domains that contributed most to lower scores were quality of chart review and quality of data extraction. Of 49 infections, 15 (30.6%) had been overlooked in a random sample of 1,110 patient records, accounting for a sensitivity of 69.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6%–81.7%), a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.5%–100%), a positive predictive value of 97.1% (95% CI, 85.1%–99.9%), and a negative predictive value of 98.6% (95% CI, 97.7%–99.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of a well-defined surveillance methodology, there is a wide variation of SSI surveillance quality. The quality of chart review and the accuracy of data collection are the main areas for improvement.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1172–1181

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 38 , Issue 10 , October 2017 , pp. 1172 - 1181
Copyright
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: These data were presented in part at the Fourth International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC) on June 23, 2017, in Geneva, Switzerland

a

Authors of equal contribution.

b

Members of Swissnoso are (in alphabetical order): Carlo Balmelli, MD, Lugano; Marie-Christine Eisenring, RN, ICP, CNS, Sion; Stephan Harbarth, MD, MS, Geneva; Stefan P. Kuster, MD, MSc, Zurich; Jonas Marschall, MD, MSc, Bern; Virginie Masserey Spicher, MD, Bern; Didier Pittet, MD, MS, Geneva; Christian Ruef, MD, Zurich; Hugo Sax, MD, Zurich; Matthias Schlegel, MD, St. Gallen; Alexander Schweiger, MD, Basel; Nicolas Troillet, MD, MSc, Sion; Andreas F. Widmer, MD, MSc, Basel; Giorgio Zanetti, MD, MSc, Lausanne.

References

REFERENCES

1. Kirkland, KB, Briggs, JP, Trivette, SL, Wilkinson, WE, Sexton, DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:725–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Perencevich, EN, Sands, KE, Cosgrove, SE, Guadagnoli, E, Meara, E, Platt, R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:196–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Wenzel, RP. The Lowbury Lecture. The economics of nosocomial infections. J Hosp Infect 1995;31:79–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Badia, JM, Casey, AL, Petrosillo, N, Hudson, PM, Mitchell, SA, Crosby, C. Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries. J Hosp Infect 2017;96:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Jenks, PJ, Laurent, M, McQuarry, S, Watkins, R. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection (SSI) and predicted financial consequences of elimination of SSI from an English hospital. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:24–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Weber, WP, Zwahlen, M, Reck, S, et al. Economic burden of surgical site infections at a European university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Troillet, N, Aghayev, E, Eisenring, MC, Widmer, AF, Swissnoso. First results of the Swiss National Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Program: Who seeks shall find. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:697–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Bruce, J, Russell, EM, Mollison, J, Krukowski, ZH. The quality of measurement of surgical wound infection as the basis for monitoring: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2001;49:99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Gastmeier, P, Kampf, G, Hauer, T, et al. Experience with two validation methods in a prevalence survey on nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:668–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wenzel, RP, Osterman, CA, Townsend, TR, et al. Development of a statewide program for surveillance and reporting of hospital-acquired infections. J Infect Dis 1979;140:741–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. McCoubrey, J, Reilly, J, Mullings, A, Pollock, KG, Johnston, F. Validation of surgical site infection surveillance data in Scotland. J Hosp Infect 2005;61:194–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Haley, VB, Van Antwerpen, C, Tserenpuntsag, B, et al. Use of administrative data in efficient auditing of hospital-acquired surgical site infections, New York State 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:565–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Swissnono website. https://www.swissnoso.ch/module/ssi-surveillance/material/handbuch-formulare/. Updated 2017. Accessed July 25, 2017.Google Scholar
15. Friedman, ND, Russo, PL, Bull, AL, Richards, MJ, Kelly, H. Validation of coronary artery bypass graft surgical site infection surveillance data from a statewide surveillance system in Australia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:812–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Huotari, K, Agthe, N, Lyytikainen, O. Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in orthopedic procedures. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:216–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Masia, MD, Barchitta, M, Liperi, G, et al. Validation of intensive care unit-acquired infection surveillance in the Italian SPIN-UTI network. J Hosp Infect 2010;76:139–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Zuschneid, I, Geffers, C, Sohr, D, et al. Validation of surveillance in the intensive care unit component of the German nosocomial infections surveillance system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:496–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91:152S–157S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, et al. National nosocomial infections surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:19–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Hubner, M, Diana, M, Zanetti, G, Eisenring, MC, Demartines, N, Troillet, N. Surgical site infections in colon surgery: the patient, the procedure, the hospital, and the surgeon. Arch Surg 2011;146:1240–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Romy, S, Eisenring, MC, Bettschart, V, Petignat, C, Francioli, P, Troillet, N. Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 2008;247:627–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Staszewicz, W, Eisenring, MC, Bettschart, V, Harbarth, S, Troillet, N. Thirteen years of surgical site infection surveillance in Swiss hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2014;88:40–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. National Association for Quality Development in Hospitals and Clinics (ANQ) website. http://www.anq.ch/akutsomatik/akutsomatik-anq-hplus/. Updated 2017. Accessed July 24, 2017.Google Scholar
25. Buderer, NM. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:895–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Birgand, G, Lepelletier, D, Baron, G, et al. Agreement among healthcare professionals in ten European countries in diagnosing case-vignettes of surgical-site infections. PLoS One 2013;8:e68618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. A report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:609–621.Google Scholar
28. Talbot, TR, Bratzler, DW, Carrico, RM, et al. Public reporting of health care-associated surveillance data: recommendations from the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:631–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) External Validation Guidance and Toolkit 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/validation/2016/2016-nhsn-ev-guidance.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed July 24, 2017.Google Scholar
30. Mannien, J, van der Zeeuw, AE, Wille, JC, van den Hof, S. Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in the Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:36–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Broderick, A, Mori, M, Nettleman, MD, Streed, SA, Wenzel, RP. Nosocomial infections: validation of surveillance and computer modeling to identify patients at risk. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:734–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Cardo, DM, Falk, PS, Mayhall, CG. Validation of surgical wound surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:211–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Larson, E, Horan, T, Cooper, B, Kotilainen, HR, Landry, S, Terry, B. Study of the definition of nosocomial infections (SDNI). Research Committee of the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:259–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Carley, S, Dosman, S, Jones, SR, Harrison, M. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies. Emerg Med J 2005;22:180–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Kuster supplementary material 1

Supplementary Table

Download Kuster supplementary material 1(File)
File 109.6 KB