Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:34:41.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real-world assessment of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nasopharyngeal swab testing in a region with a high burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Part of: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2021

Rohit B. Sangal Open the ORCID record for Rohit B. Sangal [Opens in a new window] ,
David R. Peaper ,
Craig Rothenberg ,
Hasan Fadlallah ,
Motunrayo Mobolaji-Lawal ,
Marie L. Landry ,
L. Scott Sussman ,
Andrew Ulrich  and
Arjun K. Venkatesh
Rohit B. Sangal
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
David R. Peaper
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Craig Rothenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Hasan Fadlallah
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Motunrayo Mobolaji-Lawal
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Marie L. Landry
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut Clinical Virology Laboratory, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
L. Scott Sussman
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Andrew Ulrich
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Arjun K. Venkatesh*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
*
Author for correspondence: Arjun Venkatesh, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Concerns persist regarding possible false-negative results that may compromise COVID-19 containment. Although obtaining a true false-negative rate is infeasible, using real-life observations, the data suggest a possible false-negative rate of ˜2.3%. Use of a sensitive, amplified RNA platform should reassure healthcare systems.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 43 , Issue 8 , August 2022 , pp. 1051 - 1053
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kucirka, LM, Lauer, SA, Laeyendecker, O, Boon, D, Lessler, J. Variation in false-negative rate of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction–based SARS-CoV-2 tests by time since exposure. Ann Intern Med 2020. doi: 10.7326/M20-1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López de la Iglesia, J, Fernández-Villa, T, Rivero, A, et al. Predictive factors of COVID-19 in patients with negative RT-qPCR. Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN 2020;46:6–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rong, Y, Wang, F, Liu, J, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients with false-negative SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. J Med Virol 2021;93:448–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, H, Yan, L, Qiu, C, et al. Analysis and prediction of false-negative results for SARS-CoV-2 detection with pharyngeal swab specimen in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.26.20043042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DA, Zucker, J, Westblade, LF, et al. Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests. J Clin Microbiol 2020;58(8):e00995–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landry, ML, Criscuolo, J, Peaper, DR. Challenges in use of saliva for detection of SARS CoV-2 RNA in symptomatic outpatients. J Clin Virol 2020;130:104567–104567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaston, DC, Malinis, M, Osborn, R, et al. Clinical implications of SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values in solid-organ transplant recipients. Am J Transpl 2021;21:1304–1311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clementi, N, Ferrarese, R, Tonelli, M, et al. Lower nasopharyngeal viral load during the latest phase of COVID-19 pandemic in a northern Italy university hospital. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1573–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R, Yi, S, Zhang, J, Lv, Z, Zhu, C, Zhang, Y. Viral load dynamics in sputum and nasopharyngeal swab in patients with COVID-19. J Dent Res 2020;99:1239–1244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Sangal et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Sangal et al. supplementary material(File)
File 31.9 KB