Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:43:42.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quicker, Easier, and Cheaper? The Promise of Automated Hand Hygiene Monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Andrew Stewardson  and
Didier Pittet
Andrew Stewardson
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
Didier Pittet*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland First Global Patient Safety Challenge, Patient Safety Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
*
Infection Control Program, and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are several reasons why surveillance of hand hygiene performance is a crucial part of successful promotion strategies. These can be conceptualized according to the end-user of the data: infection control professionals; healthcare workers (HCWs); researchers; and external stakeholders, such as governmental and nongovernmental accreditation and benchmarking bodies and the general public. Each of these groups comes to hand hygiene performance data with different expectations and preconceptions and will use it for different purposes. Thus, one of the challenges of collecting such data is to do it in such a way that it satisfies the specifications of all interested parties as much as possible.

Boyce provides a thorough and balanced overview of the current state of hand hygiene monitoring. At a time when the field of hand hygiene promotion is maturing rapidly and infection control professionals are facing a vast range of options for monitoring performance in their hospital, this review comes as a timely and welcome summary and answers many common questions in addition to demystifying some newer technologies.

Type
Review Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 32 , Issue 10 , October 2011 , pp. 1029 - 1031
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000;356:1307–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
3. Boyce, J. Measuring healthcare worker hand hygiene activity: current practices and emerging technologies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:1016–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Sax, H, Allegranzi, B, Uckay, I, Larson, E, Boyce, J, Pittet, D. “My five moments for hand hygiene”: a user-centred design approach to understand, training, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:9–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Allegranzi, B, Sax, H, Bengaly, L, et al. Successful implementation of the World Health Organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in a referral hospital in Mali, Africa. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. World Health Organization. Testing the WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care in eight pilot sites worldwide. http://www.who.int/gpsc/country_work/pilot_sites/introduction/en/. Accessed July 5, 2011.Google Scholar
7. Jenner, EA, Fletcher, BC, Watson, P, Jones, FA, Miller, L, Scott, GM. Discrepancy between self-reported and observed hand hygiene behaviour in healthcare professionals. J Hosp Infect 2006;63:418–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Haustein, T, Gastmeier, P, Holmes, A, et al. Use of benchmarking and public reporting for infection control in four high-income countries. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:471-481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Pittet, D, Allegranzi, B, Sax, H, et al. Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6:641–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Fuller, C, Besser, S, Cookson, BD, et al. Technical note: assessment of blinding of hand hygiene observers in randomized controlled trials of hand hygiene interventions. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:332–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed