Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:13:15.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictive Value of Blood Cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Charles W. Stratton ,
Victor Lorian  and
Leonard Amaral
Victor Lorian*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Infection Control, The Bronx Lebanon Hospital, Bronx, New York
Leonard Amaral
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Laboratories, The Bronx Lebanon Hospital, Bronx, New York
*
Department of Epidemiology and Infection Control, The Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, 1650 Grand Concourse, Bronx, NY 10457
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The rising incidence of immunocompromised-patient infections caused by bacteria that are normally nonvirulent and indigenous to normal flora has focused attention on the contamination rate of blood cultures. This contamination is usually a consequence of the mode of collection or processing within the laboratory.

The contamination rates of blood cultures usually are reported to a hospital's quality assurance component and to the medical staff. In addition, the identification of organisms isolated from blood cultures is reported to the physician, regardless of whether the organism isolated is a contaminant or the infectious agent. Consequently, reporting positive blood cultures that reflect contamination in certain cases may trigger some physicians to initiate prompt antibacterial therapy. The contamination rate of the blood culture has, therefore, a serious impact on medical consequences as well as on resource use.

Type
Topics in Clinical Microbiology
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , May 1992 , pp. 293 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Isaacman, DJ, Karasic, RB. Utility of collecting blood cultures through newly inserted intravenous catheters. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9:815–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Spencer, RC, Savage, MA. Laboratory contamination of blood cultures. ] Clin Path. 1975;28:980–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Bates, DW, Goldman, L, Lee, TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. JAMA. 1991;265:365–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. McLaughlin, JC, Hamilton, P, Scholes, JV, Bartlett, RC. Clinical laboratory comparison of lysis centrifugation and BACTEC radiometric blood culture techniques. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18:1027–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Washington, JA, Ilstrup, DM. Blood cultures: issues and controversies. Rev Infect Dis. 1986;8:792–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Baron, EJ, Finegold, SM. Diagnostic Microbiology. 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1990.Google Scholar
7. Ferraro, MJB, Kunz, LJ. Predictive value of microbiologic diagnostic tests. In: Lorian, V, ed. Significance of Medical Microbiology in the Care of Patients. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, Inc.; 1982:248-267, 284.Google Scholar
8. Galen, RS, Gambino, SR. Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1975.Google Scholar
9. Washington, JA. Blood cultures. In: Lorian, V, ed. Significance of Medical Microbiology. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1982:133–157.Google Scholar
10. Wilson, WR, Van Scoy, RE, Washington, JA II. Incidence of bacteremia in adults without infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1975;2:94–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. MacGregor, RR, Beaty, HN. Evaluation of positive blood cultures: guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Arch Intern Med. 1972;130:87–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed