Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:45:31.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patient Safety Culture and the Ability to Improve: A Proof of Concept Study on Hand Hygiene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

Martine G. Caris ,
Pim G. A. Kamphuis ,
Mireille Dekker ,
Martine C. de Bruijne ,
Michiel A. van Agtmael  and
Christina M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls
Martine G. Caris*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Pim G. A. Kamphuis
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Mireille Dekker
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Martine C. de Bruijne
Affiliation:
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Michiel A. van Agtmael
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Christina M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
*
Address correspondence to Martine G. Caris, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the safety culture of a hospital unit is associated with the ability to improve.

DESIGN

Qualitative investigation of safety culture on hospital units following a before-and-after trial on hand hygiene.

SETTING

VU University Medical Center, a tertiary-care hospital in the Netherlands.

METHODS

With support from hospital management, we implemented a hospital-wide program to improve compliance. Over 2 years, compliance was measured through direct observation, twice before, and 4 times after interventions. We analyzed changes in compliance from baseline, and selected units to evaluate safety culture using a positive deviance approach: the hospital unit with the highest hand hygiene compliance and 2 units that showed significant improvement (21% and 16%, respectively) were selected as high performing. Another 2 units showed no improvement and were selected as low performing. A blinded, independent observer conducted interviews with unit management, physicians, and nurses, based on the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Safety culture was categorized as pathological (lowest level), reactive, bureaucratic, proactive, or generative (highest level).

RESULTS

Overall, 3 units showed a proactive or generative safety culture and 2 units had bureaucratic or pathological safety cultures. When comparing compliance and interview results, high-performing units showed high levels of safety culture, while low-performing units showed low levels of safety culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Safety culture is associated with the ability to improve hand hygiene. Interventions may not be effective when applied in units with low levels of safety culture. Although additional research is needed to corroborate our findings, the safety culture on a unit can benefit from enhancement strategies such as team-building exercises. Strengthening the safety culture before implementing interventions could aid improvement and prevent nonproductive interventions.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1277–1283

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 38 , Issue 11 , November 2017 , pp. 1277 - 1283
Copyright
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. An abstract of the findings in this manuscript was presented as a poster at the annual ECCMID conference on April 24, 2017, in Vienna, Austria (Abstract P1513).

References

REFERENCES

1. Dodek, P, Cahill, NE, Heyland, DK. The relationship between organizational culture and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a narrative review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2010;34:669–674.Google Scholar
2. De Bono, S, Heling, G, Borg, MA. Organizational culture and its implications for infection prevention and control in healthcare institutions. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Pittet, D, Allegranzi, B, Sax, H, et al. Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6:641–652.Google Scholar
4. Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000;356:1307–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Kirkland, KB, Homa, KA, Lasky, RA, Ptak, JA, Taylor, EA, Splaine, ME. Impact of a hospital-wide hand hygiene initiative on healthcare-associated infections: results of an interrupted time series. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:1019–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Huis, A, Holleman, G, Van Achterberg, T, Grol, R, Schoonhoven, L, Hulscher, M. Explaining the effects of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses: a process evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2013;8:41.Google Scholar
7. Huis, A, Van Achterberg, T, De Bruin, M, Grol, R, Schoonhoven, L, Hulscher, M. A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach. Implement Sci 2012;7:92.Google Scholar
8. Erasmus, V, Daha, TJ, Brug, H, et al. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:283–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Tromp, M, Huis, A, De Guchteneire, I, et al. The short-term and long-term effectiveness of a multidisciplinary hand hygiene improvement program. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:732–736.Google Scholar
10. Gould, DJ, Hewitt-Taylor, J, Drey, NS, Gammon, J, Chudleigh, J, Weinberg, JR. The CleanYourHandsCampaign: critiquing policy and evidence base. J Hosp Infect 2007;65:95–101.Google Scholar
11. Creedon, SA. Hand hygiene compliance: exploring variations in practice between hospitals. Nurs Times 2008;104:32–35.Google Scholar
12. Cantrell, D, Shamriz, O, Cohen, MJ, Stern, Z, Block, C, Brezis, M. Hand hygiene compliance by physicians: marked heterogeneity due to local culture? Am J Infect Control 2009;37:301–305.Google Scholar
13. Homa, K, Kirkland, KB. Determining next steps in a hand hygiene improvement initiative by examining variation in hand hygiene compliance rates. Qual Manag Health Care 2011;20:116–121.Google Scholar
14. Saint, S, Conti, A, Bartoloni, A, et al. Improving healthcare worker hand hygiene adherence before patient contact: a before-and-after five-unit multimodal intervention in Tuscany. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:429–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Peterson, TH, Teman, SF, Connors, RH. A safety culture transformation: its effects at a children’s hospital. J Patient Saf 2012;8:125–130.Google Scholar
16. Larson, EL, Early, E, Cloonan, P, Sugrue, S, Parides, M. An organizational climate intervention associated with increased handwashing and decreased nosocomial infections. Behav Med 2000;26:14–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Hlady, CS, Severson, MA, Segre, AM, Polgreen, PM. A mobile handheld computing application for recording hand hygiene observations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:975–977.Google Scholar
18. Hand Hygiene Technical Reference Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
19. Curry, LA, Spatz, E, Cherlin, E, et al. What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? A qualitative study. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:384–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Smits, M, Christiaans-Dingelhoff, I, Wagner, C, Wal, G, Groenewegen, PP. The psychometric properties of the ‘Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture’ in Dutch hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Law, MP, Zimmerman, R, Baker, GR, Smith, T. Assessment of safety culture maturity in a hospital setting. Healthc Qual 2010; 13 Spec No: 110–115.Google Scholar
22. Westrum, R.. A typology of organisational cultures. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:ii22–ii27.Google Scholar
23. Parker, D, Lawrie, M, Hudson, P. A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture. Safety Science 2006;44:551–562.Google Scholar
24. Organizational tools. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/research/methods_measures/human_factors/organizational_tools/en/. Published 2017. Accessed May 10, 2017.Google Scholar
25. Young-Xu, Y, Neily, J, Mills, PD, et al. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical morbidity. Arch Surg 2011;146:1368–1373.Google Scholar
26. Neily, J, Mills, PD, Young-Xu, Y, et al. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 2010;304:1693–1700.Google Scholar
27. Epps, HR, Levin, PE. The TeamSTEPPS approach to safety and quality. J Pediatr Orthop 2015;35:S30–S33.Google Scholar
28. Kilbride, HW, Powers, R, Wirtschafter, DD, et al. Evaluation and development of potentially better practices to prevent neonatal nosocomial bacteremia. Pediatrics 2003;111:e504–e518.Google Scholar
29. Cumbler, E, Castillo, L, Satorie, L, et al. Culture change in infection control: applying psychological principles to improve hand hygiene. J Nurs Care Qual 2013;28:304–311.Google Scholar
30. Kilbride, HW, Wirtschafter, DD, Powers, RJ, Sheehan, MB. Implementation of evidence-based potentially better practices to decrease nosocomial infections. Pediatrics 2003;111:e519–e533.Google Scholar
31. Hoyt, DB. Looking forward. How Memorial Hermann Health System innovative approach to improved surgical quality and patient safety. Bull Am Coll Surg 2013;98:7–8.Google ScholarPubMed
32. Pronovost, P. Interventions to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU: the Keystone Intensive Care Unit Project. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(S171):e1–e5.Google Scholar
33. Jain, R, Kralovic, SM, Evans, ME, et al. Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1419–1430.Google Scholar
34. Hessels, AJ, Genovese-Schek, V, Agarwal, M, Wurmser, T, Larson, EL. Relationship between patient safety climate and adherence to standard precautions. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:1128–1132.Google Scholar
35. Hagel, S, Reischke, J, Kesselmeier, M, et al. Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:957–962.Google Scholar
36. Fleming, M. Patient safety culture measurement and improvement: a “how to” guide. Healthc Q 2005. 8 Spec No 14–19.Google Scholar
37. Nieva, VF, Sorra, J. Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii17–ii23.Google Scholar
38. Meddings, J, Reichert, H, Greene, MT, et al. Evaluation of the association between Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) measures and catheter-associated infections: results of two national collaboratives. BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:226–235.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Caris et al supplementary material

Caris et al supplementary material 1

Download Caris et al supplementary material(File)
File 43.1 KB