Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:45:08.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Infection Control: Study of Compliance With Isolation Precautions in a Paris University Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Gwenaëlle M. Vidal-Trecan ,
Natalie Delamare ,
Stephanie Tcherny-Lessenot ,
Jacqueline Lamory ,
François Baudin ,
Michel de Prittwitz  and
Dominique Salmon-Ceron
Gwenaëlle M. Vidal-Trecan*
Affiliation:
Département de Santé Publique, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France Comité Local de Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
Natalie Delamare
Affiliation:
Département de Santé Publique, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
Stephanie Tcherny-Lessenot
Affiliation:
Département de Santé Publique, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
Jacqueline Lamory
Affiliation:
Direction du service de soins infirmiers, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
François Baudin
Affiliation:
Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
Michel de Prittwitz
Affiliation:
Comité Local de Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
Dominique Salmon-Ceron
Affiliation:
Comité Local de Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France Département de médecine interne, CHU Cochin—Port Royal, APHP, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
*
Département de Santé Publique, CHU Cochin Port Royal, 24-27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Isolation practices in a university hospital were analyzed for 137 patients with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Isolation was ordered in writing by physicians for 40% and instituted by nurses for 60%; 74% were isolated. Compliance depended on physician ordering in writing (odds ratio, 36.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.8-274.9). Nurses complied best with hand washing.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , February 2001 , pp. 109 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Comité technique national des infections nosocomiales and Société française d'hygiène hospitalière. Isolement septique: recommandations pour les établissements de soins. Ministère de l'emploi et de la solidarité, secrétariat à la santé. 1998. Paris.Google Scholar
2. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals, part II: recommendations for isolation precautions in hospitals. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:32–52.Google Scholar
3. Pocquet, K, Lepoutre-Toulemon, A, Cullet, D. Activités des comités de lutte contre les infections nosocomiales en 1996 et évolution depuis 1993. Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire 1998;27:1–3.Google Scholar
4. Comité technique national des infections nosocomiales, Cellule infections nosocomiales, CLLIN Est et al. Enquête nationale de prévalence des infections nosocomiales, 1996. Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire 1997;36:1–3.Google Scholar
5. Maheux, B, Beland, F, Pineault, R. The influence of medical school programs on physicians' attitudes toward universal access to medical care. Med Care 1987;25:202–209.Google Scholar
6. Gould, D. Nurses' hand decontamination practice: results of a local study. J Hosp Infect 1994;28:15–30.Google Scholar
7. Larson, E, Kretzer, EK. Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions. J Hosp Infect 1995;30(suppl):88–106.Google Scholar