Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:44:22.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Klebsiella Marker Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sally Jo Rubin
Sally Jo Rubin*
Affiliation:
Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
*
Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, CT 06105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Klebsiella marker systems include determination of susceptibility patterns, serotype, bacteriocin susceptibility, bacteriophage susceptibility, biotype, and plasmid content, size and endonuclease fragment size. Susceptibility patterns are useful only if unusual patterns (ie, aminoglycoside resistance) occur. Serotypes are stable, reproducible markers. Over 90% of isolates can be serotyped and epidemiologically unrelated strains are widely distributed among the 72 standard types. Antisera are not available commercially except to types 1 to 6 and serotyping is expensive and time-consuming. Bacteriocin susceptibility typing is easier and cheaper but reproducibility is sometimes poor. Depending on the producer strains used, between 67% and 96% of strains are typable. As a single typing method, bacteriophage typing is not very sensitive. Only 70% of strains are typable and 20% are of a single type. There are two major problems with most biotyping systems: poor reproducibility and poor sensitivity. A high percent of strains is the same type. Plasmid analysis is technically the most complicated but is important if strains are aminoglycoside resistant. No one method is ideal, and characterization of isolates from an outbreak is best done by using several different marker systems.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , February 1985 , pp. 59 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Edwards, PR, Ewing, WH: Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, ed 3. Minneapolis, Burgess Publishing Company, 1972, p 294.Google Scholar
2. Riser, E, Noone, P, Poulton, TA: A new serotyping method for Klebsiella species: Development of the technique. J Clin Pathol 1976; 29:296–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Murcia, A, Rubin, SJ: Reproducibility of an indirect immunofluorescent-antibody technique for capsular serotyping of Klebsiella pneumoniae . J Clin Microbiol 1979; 9:208–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Palfreyman, JM: Klebsiella serotyping by counter-current immunoelectrophoresis. J Hyg 1978; 81:219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Onokodi, JK, Wauters, G: Capsular typing of Klebsiellas by coagglutination and latex agglutination. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 13:609–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Rennie, RP, Duncan, IBR: Combined biochemical and serological typing of clinical isolates of Klebsiella . Appl Environ Microbiol 1974; 28:534–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Rennie, RP, Nord, CE, Sjoberg, L, et al: Comparison of bacteriophage typing, serotyping, and biotyping as aids in epidemiological surveillance of Klebsiella infections. J Clin Microbiol 1978; 8:638–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Martin, WJ, Yu, PKW, Washington, JA: Epidemiologic significance of Klebsiella pneumoniae. A 3-month study. Mayo Clin Proc 1971; 46:785–793.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Edmondson, AS, Cooke, EM: The development and assessment of a bacteriocin typing method for Klebsiella . J Hyg 1979; 82:207–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Blanchette, EA, Rubin, SJ: Seroepidemiology of clinical isolates of Klebsiella in Connecticut. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 11:474–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Casewell, MW: Titres and cross reactions of commercial antisera for the capsular typing of Klebsiella species. J Clin Pathol 1975; 28:33–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Hall, FA: Bacteriocine typing of Klebsiella spp. J Clin Pathol 1971; 24:712–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Buffenmyer, CL, Rycheck, RR, Yee, RB: Bacteriocin (klebocin) sensitivity typing of Klebsiella . J Clin Microbiol 1976; 4:239–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Bauernfeind, A, Petermüller, C, Schneider, R: Bacteriocins as a tool for analysis of nosocomial infections with Klebsiella pneumoniae . J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14:15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. de Silva, MI, Rubin, SJ: Multiple biotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae in single clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1977; 5:62–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Butler, DA, Lobregat, CM, Gavan, TL: Reproducibility of the Analytab (API 20E) system. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 2:322–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Kilbourn, JP, Nyiendo, J: Reproducibility of biotypes using entero-tubes. Am J Med Technol 1979; 45:355–360.Google Scholar
18. Barr, JG, Hogg, GM: Biotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae (sensu lato) and Enterobacter aerogenes characterized by differential substrate metabolism: Application of the technique. J Clin Pathol 1979; 32:935–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Seal, DV, McSwiggan, DA, Datta, N, et al: Characterization of an epidemic strain of Klebsiella and its variants by computer analysis. J Med Microbiol 1981; 14:295–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Tompkins, LS, Plorde, JJ, Falkow, S: Molecular analysis of R-factors from multiresistant nosocomial isolates. J Infect Dis 1980; 141:625–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed