Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:07:01.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intrinsic Klebsiella pneumoniae Contamination of Liquid Germicidal Hand Soap Containing Chlorhexidine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Steven E. Brooks ,
Mary A. Walczak ,
Sharon Malcolm  and
Rizwanullah Hameed
Steven E. Brooks*
Affiliation:
Departments of Infection Control/Clinical Microbiology and Medicine, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Mary A. Walczak
Affiliation:
Departments of Infection Control/Clinical Microbiology and Medicine, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Sharon Malcolm
Affiliation:
Departments of Infection Control/Clinical Microbiology and Medicine, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Rizwanullah Hameed
Affiliation:
Departments of Infection Control/Clinical Microbiology and Medicine, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
*
Department of Infection Control and Clinical Microbiology, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, 585 Schenectady Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11203
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe intrinsic contamination with Klebsiella pneumoniae occurring during the manufacture of germicidal hand soap, labeled as containing 2% chlorhexidine, used throughout a 350-bed community medical center. A 3-year retrospective study failed to find evidence of increased incidence of clinical isolates of this strain.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 25 , Issue 10 , October 2004 , pp. 883 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McNaughton, M, Mazinke, N, Thomas, E. Newborn conjunctivitis associated with triclosan 0.5% antiseptic intrinsically contaminated with Serratia marcescens . Can J Infect Control 1995;10:7–8.Google Scholar
2. Archibald, LK, Cori, A, Shah, B, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak associated with extrinsic contamination of 1% chlorxylenol soap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:704–709.10.2307/30141511Google Scholar
3. Sartor, C, Jacomo, V, Duvivier, C, Tissot-Dupont, H, Sambuc, R, Drancourt, M. Nosocomial Serratia marcescens infections associated with extrinsic contamination of a liquid nonmedicated soap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:196–199.10.1086/501743Google Scholar
4. McAllister, TA, Lucas, CE, Mocan, H, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak in a paediatric oncology unit traced to contaminated chlorhexidine. Scott Med J 1989;34:525–528.10.1177/003693308903400506Google Scholar
5. Vigeant, P, Loo, VG, Bertrand, C, et al. An outbreak of Serratia marcescens infections related to contaminated chlorhexidine. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:791–794.Google Scholar
6. Sobel, JD, Hashman, N, Reinherz, G, Merzbach, D. Nosocomial Pseudomonas cepacia infection associated with chlorhexidine contamination. Am } Med 1982;73:183–186.10.1016/0002-9343(82)90176-0Google Scholar
7. Kahan, A, Philippon, A, Paul, G, et al. Nosocomial infections by chlorhexidine solution contaminated with Pseudomonas pickettii (Biovar VA-I). J Infect 1983;7:256–263.10.1016/S0163-4453(83)97196-7Google Scholar
8. Oie, S, Kamiya, A. Microbial contamination of antiseptics and disinfectants. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:389–395.10.1016/S0196-6553(96)90027-9Google Scholar
9. Stickler, DJ. Susceptibility of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria to biocides: a perspective from the study of catheter biofilms. J Appi Microbiol 2002;92 (suppl) :163S–170S.Google Scholar
10. Brooks, SE, Walczak, MA, Hameed, R, Coonan, P. chlorhexidine resistance in antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from the surfaces of dispensers of soap containing chlorhexidine. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:692–695.10.1086/501996Google Scholar