Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:27:18.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infection Related to Implantable Central Venous Access Devices in Cancer Patients: Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Maristela P. Freire ,
Ligia C. Pierrotti ,
Antônio E. Zerati ,
Pedro H. X. N. Araújo ,
J. M. Motta-Leal-Filho ,
Laiane P. G. Duarte ,
Karim Y. Ibrahim ,
Antonia A. L. Souza ,
Maria P. E. Diz  and
Juliana Pereira
...Show all authors
Maristela P. Freire*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Institute do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Ligia C. Pierrotti
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Institute do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Antônio E. Zerati
Affiliation:
Vascular Surgery Service, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Pedro H. X. N. Araújo
Affiliation:
Thoracic Surgery Service, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
J. M. Motta-Leal-Filho
Affiliation:
Interventional Radiology Service, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Laiane P. G. Duarte
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Institute do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Karim Y. Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Institute do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Antonia A. L. Souza
Affiliation:
Assistance Direction, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Maria P. E. Diz
Affiliation:
Clinical Oncology Division, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Juliana Pereira
Affiliation:
Hematology Division, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Paulo M. Hoff
Affiliation:
Clinical Oncology Division, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Edson Abdala
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Institute do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 251 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To describe the epidemiology of infections related to the use of implantable central venous access devices (CVADs) in cancer patients and to evaluate measures aimed at reducing the rates of such infections.

Design.

Prospective cohort study.

Setting.

Referral hospital for cancer in São Paulo, Brazil.

Patients.

We prospectively evaluated all implantable CVADs employed between January 2009 and December 2011. Inpatients and outpatients were followed until catheter removal, transfer to another facility, or death.

Methods.

Outcome measures were bloodstream infection and pocket infection. We also evaluated the effects that the creation of a multidisciplinary team for CVAD care, avoiding in-hospital implantation of CVADs, and limiting CVAD insertion in neutropenic patients have on the rates of such infections.

Results.

During the study period, 966 CVADs (mostly venous ports) were implanted in 933 patients, for a combined total of 243,792 catheter-days. We identified 184 episodes of infection: 154 (84%) were bloodstream infections, 21 (11%) were pocket infections, and 9 (5%) were surgical site infections. During the study period, the rate of CVAD-related infection dropped from 2.2 to 0.24 per 1,000 catheter-days (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that relevant risk factors for such infection include surgical reintervention, implantation in a neutropenic patient, in-hospital implantation, use of a cuffed catheter, and nonchemotherapy indication for catheter use.

Conclusions.

Establishing a multidisciplinary team specifically focused on CVAD care, together with systematic reporting of infections, appears to reduce the rates of infection related to the use of these devices.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 34 , Issue 7 , July 2013 , pp. 671 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.O'Grady, NP, Alexander, M, Burns, LA, et al. Summary of recommendations: guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:1087–1099.Google Scholar
2.Bass, J, Halton, J, Drouet, Y, Ni, A, Barrowman, N. Central venous catheter database: an important issue in quality assurance. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:942–945.Google Scholar
3.Beckers, MM, Ruven, HJ, Seldenrijk, CA, Prins, MH, Biesma, DH. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer. Thromb Res 2010;125:318–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Touré, A, Vanhems, P, Lombard-Bohas, C, et al. Totally implantable central venous access port infections in patients with digestive cancer: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:935–939.Google Scholar
5.Wolosker, N, Yazbek, G, Nishinari, K, et al. Totally implantable venous catheters for chemotherapy: experience in 500 patients. Sao Paulo Med J 2004;4:147–151.Google Scholar
6.Penel, N, Neu, JC, Clisant, S, Hoppe, H, Devos, P, Yazdanpanah, Y. Risk factors for early catheter-related infections. Cancer 2007;110:1586–1592.Google Scholar
7.Yoshida, J, Ishimaru, T, Kikuchi, T, Matsubara, N, Asano, I. Association between risk of bloodstream infection and duration of use of totally implantable access ports and central lines: a 24-month study. Am J Infect Control 2011;7:e39–e43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chang, YF, Lo, AC, Tsai, CH, et al. Higher complication risk of totally implantable venous access port systems in patients with advanced cancer: a single institution retrospective analysis. Pal-Hat Med 2013;27:185–191.Google Scholar
9.Ramritu, P, Halton, K, Cook, D, Whitby, M, Graves, N. Catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008;62:3–21.Google Scholar
10.Harron, K, Ramachandra, G, Mok, Q, Gilbert, R; CATCH Team. Consistency between guidelines and reported practice for reducing the risk of catheter-related infection in British paediatric intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2011;37:1641–1647.Google Scholar
11.Mermel, LA, Allon, M, Bouza, E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:1–45.Google Scholar
12.Sotir, MJ, Lewis, C, Bisher, EW, Ray, SM. Epidemiology of device-associated infections related to a long-term implantable vascular access device. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:187–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Tomlinson, D, Mermel, LA, Ethier, MC, Matlow, A, Gillmeister, B, Sung, L. Defining bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:697–710.Google Scholar
14.Hsieh, CC, Weng, HH, Huang, WS, et al. Analysis of risk factors for central venous port failure in cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:4709–4714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Crisinel, M, Mahy, S, Ortega-Debalon, P, et al. Incidence, prevalence and risk factors for a first infectious complication on a totally implantable venous-access port. Med Mai Infect 2009;39: 252–258.Google Scholar
16.Nam, SH, Kim, DY, Kim, SC, Kim, IK. Complications and risk factors of infection in pediatric hemato-oncology patients with totally implantable access ports (TIAPs). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010;54:546–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Freifeld, AG, Bow, EJ, Sepkowitz, KA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial microorganisms in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e56–e93.Google Scholar
18.Nouwen, JL, Wielenga, JJ, van Overhagen, H, et al. Hickman catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients: insertion in the operating theater versus insertion in the radiology suite. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1304–1311.Google Scholar
19.World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009: Safe Surgery Saves Lives. Geneva: WHO, 2009. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598552_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
20.Petrosillo, N, Drapeau, CM, Nicastri, E, et al. Surgical site infections in Italian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Infect Dis 2008;8:34.Google Scholar
21.Pegues, D, Axelrod, P, McClarren, C, et al. Comparison of infections in Hickman and implanted port catheters in adult solid tumor patients. J Surg Oncol 1992;49:156–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Adler, A, Yaniv, I, Steinberg, R, et al. Infectious complications of implantable ports and Hickman catheters in paediatric hae-matology-oncology patients. J Hosp Infect 2006;62:358–365.Google Scholar
23.Dasic, D, Hanna, SJ, Bojanic, S, Kerr, RS. External ventricular drain infection: the effect of a strict protocol on infection rates and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 2006;5:296–300.Google Scholar
24.Schneeberger, PM, Smits, MH, Zick, RE, Wille, JC. Surveillance as a starting point to reduce surgical-site infection rates in elective orthopaedic surgery. J Hosp Infect 2002;51:179–184.Google Scholar
25.Delgado-Rodríguez, M, Gómez-Ortega, A, Sillero-Arenas, M, Martínez-Gallego, G, Medina-Cuadros, M, Llorca, J. Efficacy of surveillance in nosocomial infection control in a surgical service. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Berenholtz, SM, Pronovost, PJ, Lipsett, PA, et al. Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004;32:2014–2020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed