Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:37:36.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Finger Rings on Transmission of Bacteria During Hand Contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mette Fagernes  and
Egil Lingaas
Mette Fagernes*
Affiliation:
Institute of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Egil Lingaas
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Prevention, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
*
Sykehuset i Vestfold, Klinikk Medisin, Postboks 2168, Postterminalen, N-3103 Tonsberg, Norway ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To investigate the impact of finger rings on the transmission of bacteria from the hands of healthcare workers and the impact on the microflora on the hands of healthcare workers in clinical practice.

Design.

Our study had a nonequivalent control group posttest-only design (pre-experimental). Healthcare workers who wore finger ring(s) on 1 hand and no ring on the other hand (n = 100) and a control group of healthcare workers who did not wear any rings (n = 100) exchanged standardized hand shakes with an investigator wearing sterile gloves. Samples from the gloved hands of the investigators and the bare hands of the healthcare workers were thereafter obtained by the glove juice technique.

Setting.

Two Norwegian acute care hospitals.

Participants.

Healthcare workers (n = 200) during ordinary clinical work.

Results.

A significantly higher bacterial load (odds ratio, 2.63 [95% confidence interval, 1.28-5.43]; P = .009) and a significantly higher number of bacteria transmitted (odds ratio, 2.43 [95% confidence interval, 1.44-4.13]; P = .001) were associated with ringed hands, compared with control hands. However, a multiple analysis of covariance revealed no statistically significant effect of rings alone. The prevalence of nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria (42% vs 26%) and Enterobacteriaceae (26% vs 13%) was also significantly higher among persons who wore rings than among persons who did not wear rings. However, no statistically significant differences in the incidence of transmission of these pathogens were detected after hand contact. The prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and incidence of transmission of S. aureus were the same in both groups.

Conclusions.

Wearing finger rings increases the carriage rate of nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae on the hands of healthcare workers. However, no statistically significant differences in the incidence of transmission of nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria or Enterobacteriaceae were detected between the healthcare workers who wore rings and those who did not.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , May 2009 , pp. 427 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fagernes, M, Lingaas, E, Bjark, P. Impact of a single plain finger ring on the bacterial load on the hands of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1191–1195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Nicholson-Pegg, A. The wearing of wedding rings in the operating department. NATNEWS 1982;19:19–25.Google Scholar
3.Hoffman, PN, Cooke, EM, McCarville, MR, Emmerson, AM. Micro-organisms isolated from skin under wedding rings worn by hospital staff. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985;290:206–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Jacobson, G, Thiele, JE, McCune, JH, Farrell, LD. Handwashing: ring-wearing and number of microorganisms. Nurs Res 1985;34:186–188.Google Scholar
5.Salisbury, DM, Hutfilz, P, Treen, LM, Bollin, GE, Gautam, S. The effect of rings on microbial load of health care workers' hands. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:24–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Trick, WE, Vernon, MO, Hayes, RA, et al. Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1383–1390.Google Scholar
7.Alp, E, Haverkate, D, Voss, A. Hand hygiene among laboratory workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:978–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Kelsall, NK, Griggs, RK, Bowker, KE, Bannister, GC. Should finger rings be removed prior to scrubbing for theatre? J Hosp Infect 2006;62:450–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Jepson, AP, McDougall, C, Clark, A, Bateman, A, Williamson, G, Kaufmann, ME. Finger rings should be removed prior to scrubbing. J Hosp Infect 2006;64:197–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Yildirim, I, Ceyhan, M, Cengiz, AB, et al. A prospective comparative study of the relationship between different types of ring and microbial hand colonization among pediatric intensive care unit nurses. Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45:1572–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Athar, MA, Stafford, L, Wootliff, JS. Bacterial population of ring and control fingers in health care workers. Infect Control Can 1989;8–12.Google Scholar
12.Field, EA, McGowan, P, Pearce, PK, Martin, MV. Rings and watches: should they be removed prior to operative dental procedures? J Dent 1996;24:65–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Al-Allak, A, Sarasin, S, Key, S, Morris-Stiff, G. Wedding rings are not a significant source of bacterial contamination following surgical scrubbing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90:133–135.Google Scholar
14.Aiello, AE, Cimiotti, J, la-Latta, P, Larson, EL. A comparison of the bacteria found on the hands of “homemakers” and neonatal intensive care unit nurses. J Hosp Infect 2003;54:310–315.Google Scholar
15.Waterman, TR, Smeak, DD, Kowalski, J, Hade, EM. Comparison of bacterial counts in glove juice of surgeons wearing smooth band rings versus those without rings. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:421–425.Google Scholar
16.Lingaas, E, Fagernes, M. Development of a method to measure bacterial transfer during hand contact. J Hosp Infect 2009 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
17.European Committee for Standardization. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics-hygienic handwash-test methods and requirements. Phase 2. Step 2. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 1997.Google Scholar
18.Larson, EL, Laughon, BE. Comparison of four antiseptic products containing Chlorhexidine gluconate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987;31:1572–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Gustafson, DR, Vetter, EA, Larson, DR, et al. Effects of 4 hand-drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands: a randomized trial. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:705–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Kampf, G, Ostermeyer, C, Heeg, P, Paulson, D. Evaluation of two methods of determining the efficacies of two alcohol-based hand rubs for surgical hand antisepsis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:3856–3861.Google Scholar
21.Larson, E, Aiello, A, Lee, LV, la-Latta, P, Gomez-Duarte, C, Lin, S. Short-and long-term effects of handwashing with antimicrobial or plain soap in the community. J Community Health 2003;28:139–150.Google Scholar
22.McBryde, ES, Bradley, LC, Whitby, M, McElwain, DL. An investigation of contact transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2004;58:104–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Waters, V, Larson, E, Wu, F, et al. Molecular epidemiology of gram-negative bacilli from infected neonates and health care workers' hands in neonatal intensive care units. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1682–1687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Horn, WA, Larson, EL, McGinley, KJ, Leyden, JJ. Microbial flora on the hands of health care personnel: differences in composition and antibacterial resistance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1988;9:189–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Larson, EL. Persistent carriage of gram-negative bacteria on hands. Am J Infect Control 1981;9:112–119.Google Scholar
26.Petersen, NJ, Collins, DE, Marshall, JH. Evaluation of skin cleansing procedures using the wipe-rinse technique. Health Lab Sci 1974;11:182–187.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Marples, RR, Towers, AG. A laboratory model for the investigation of contact transfer of micro-organisms. J Hyg (Lond) 1979;82:237–248.Google Scholar
28.Patrick, DR, Findon, G, Miller, TE. Residual moisture determines the level of touch-contact-associated bacterial transfer following hand washing. Epidemiol Infect 1997;119:319–325.Google Scholar
29.Merry, AF, Miller, TE, Findon, G, Webster, CS, Neff, SP. Touch contamination levels during anaesthetic procedures and their relationship to hand hygiene procedures: a clinical audit. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:291–294.Google Scholar
30.Sattar, SA, Springthorpe, S, Mani, S, et al. Transfer of bacteria from fabrics to hands and other fabrics: development and application of a quantitative method using Staphylococcus aureus as a model. J Appl Microbiol 2001;90:962–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed