Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:02:33.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidemiology of Biological-Exposure Incidents Among Spanish Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Vicente Monge ,
Gloria Mato ,
Alberto Mariano ,
Cristina Fernández ,
José Fereres  and
GERABTAS Working Group
Vicente Monge*
Affiliation:
Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
Gloria Mato
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Alberto Mariano
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Cristina Fernández
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
José Fereres
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
*
Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 9.100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the frequency and the epidemiological characteristics of biological-exposure incidents occurring among healthcare personnel.

Design:

Prospective surveillance study.

Setting:

Participating Spanish primary-care and specialty centers from January 1994 to December 1997.

Participants:

70 centers in 1994, 87 in 1995, 97 in 1996, and 104 in 1997.

Methods:

Absolute and relative frequencies were calculated for several variables (position held, area of care, type of injuring object, activity, etc) and for the different categories of each variable.

Results:

There were 20,235 registered incidents. Annual incidence rates were as follows: 1994, 51 per 1,000; 1995, 58 per 1,000; 1996, 54 per 1,000; and 1997, 59 per 1,000. Mean age of accident victims was as follows: 1994, 35.68 (standard deviation [SD], 16.26); 1995, 33.6 (SD, 11.9); 1996, 38.2 (SD, 17.27); and 1997, 36.7 (SD, 16.33) years. Of the 20,235 incidents, 15,860 (80.7%) occurred to women; 50% (9,833) accidents were among nursing staff. The type of incident most frequently reported was percutaneous injury (81.1%). The highest frequency of accidents was seen in medical and surgical areas (28% and 25.6%, respectively). Blood and blood products were the most commonly involved material (87.6%). Administration of intramuscular or intravenous medication was the activity associated with the highest accident rate (20.3%). The most frequent immediate action in response was rinsing and disinfecting (65.6%).

Conclusions:

The incident registry was highly stable in terms of incidence rates over the observation period and served to highlight the large number of incidents recorded each year. The potential implications of die results are the need to explore reasons for increased exposures in certain areas, with the aim of focusing prevention efforts, and, similarly, to establish the factors associated with diminished incidence rates to model successful measures.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 22 , Issue 12 , December 2001 , pp. 776 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Marcus, R, the CDC cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group. Surveillance of health care workers exposed to blood from patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1118–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Ippolito, G, Puro, V, De Carli, G. The risk of occupational human immunodeficiency virus infection in health care workers: Italian multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:1451–1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Tokars, JI, Bell, DM, Culver, DH, Marcus, R, Mendelson, MH, Sloan, EP, et al. Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures. JAMA 1992;267:2899–2904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Panlilio, AL, Foy, DR, Edwards, JR, Bell, DM, Welch, BA, Parrish, CM, et al. Blood contacts during surgical procedures. JAMA 1991;265:1533–1537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Gerberding, JL, Littell, C, Tarkington, A, Brown, A, Schecter, WP. Risk of exposure of surgical personnel to patients' blood during surgery at San Francisco General Hospital. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1788–1793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Fitch, K, Pérez, L, De Andres, R, Najera, R. Estudio multicentrico de la CEE sobre exposition accidental al VIH. Pub Of SEISIDA 1994;5:193.Google Scholar
7. INSALUD. Grupo español de Registro de accidentes Biológicos en Trabajadores de Atencion de Salud. Accidentes biologicos en profesionales sanitarios. Epidemiologia y prevention. Madrid, Spain: International, Marketing & Communications; 1995.Google Scholar
8. Hamory, B. Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital. Am J Med 1991;90:85–90.Google Scholar
9. Shanks, NJ, Al-Kalai, D. Occupation of needlestick injuries among health care personnel in Saudi Arabia. JHosp Infect 1995;29:221–226.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Lymer, UB, Antonsson Schutz, A, Isaksson, B. A descriptive study of blood exposure incidents among healthcare workers in a university hospital in Sweden. J Hosp Infect 1997;35:223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Khuri-Bulos, NA, Toukan, A, Mahafzah, A, Al Adham, M, Faori, I, Abud Khader, I, et al. Epidemiology of needlestick and sharp injuries at a university hospital in a developing country: a 3-year prospective study at the Jordan University hospital, 1993 through 1995. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:322–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH, Brand-Elnaggar, J, Pearson, RD. Rates of needle-stick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. N Engl J Med 1988;319:284–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Pedersen, EB. Potentially hazardous exposure to blood among hospital personnel: a retrospective study of systematically registered exposure during the period 1990-1994 [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 1996;158:1807–1811.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Adegboye, AA, Moss, GB, Soyinka, F, Kreiss, JK. The epidemiology of needlestick and sharp instrument accidents in a Nigerian hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Aiken, LH, Sloane, DM, Klocinski, JL. Hospital nurses occupational exposure to blood: prospective, retrospective and institutional reports. Am J Public Health 1997;87:103–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Nelsing, S, Nielsen, TL, Nielsen, JO. Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Eur J Epidemiol 1997;13:387–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed