Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:46:47.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis Against Group B Streptococcal Infection on Comparisons of Rates of Endometritis and Urinary Tract Infection in Multicenter Surveillance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Anne-Marie Dumas ,
Raphaëlle Girard ,
Louis Ayzac ,
Geneviève Beaumont ,
Emmanuelle Caillat-Vallet ,
Florence Depaix ,
Chantal Gignoux ,
Catherine Haond ,
Noelle Pral  and
Jacqueline Robert
...Show all authors
Anne-Marie Dumas*
Affiliation:
Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Saint Genis Laval, France
Raphaëlle Girard
Affiliation:
Service d'Hygiène et Épidémiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, Saint Genis Laval, France
Louis Ayzac
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Geneviève Beaumont
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Emmanuelle Caillat-Vallet
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Florence Depaix
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Chantal Gignoux
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Catherine Haond
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Noelle Pral
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Jacqueline Robert
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Françoise Tissot-Guerraz
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Agnès Vincent-Bouletreau
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
Michel Berland
Affiliation:
Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Saint Genis Laval, France
Jacques Fabry
Affiliation:
Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est, Saint Genis Laval, France
*
Centre Hospitaller Lyon Sud, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Bâtiment 3B, Pierre Bénite Cedex, 69495 Pierre Bénite, France ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To establish whether antibiotic prophylaxis against group B streptococcal infection may be a confounding factor in comparisons of rates of endometritis and urinary tract infection after vaginal delivery.

Design.

Prospective study.

Setting.

Maternity units at 48 hospitals in a regional surveillance network in France during 2001-2004.

Methods.

The maternity units used a common protocol to establish whether antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated. Risk factors for endometritis and urinary tract infections were evaluated using multiple logistic regression.

Results.

We analyzed 49,786 vaginal deliveries. The percentage of women receiving antibiotic prophylaxis varied widely and significantly among the maternity units (range, 4.4%-26.0%; median, 15.8%; 25th percentile, 12.1%; 75th percentile, 19.0%) (P < .001, by Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test). The incidence rate of endometritis was significantly reduced from 0.25% to 0.11% by antibiotic prophylaxis (P = .001). There was a decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infection from 0.37% to 0.32%, but it was not statistically significant (P = .251).

Conclusions.

A reduction in the incidence of endometritis was observed when intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis against group B streptococcal infection was used. However, the proportion of women considered to be at risk of infection varied widely among institutions. Comparisons of rates of endometritis among maternity units, but not urinary tract infection rates, should take into account antibiotic prophylaxis as a significant confounding factor.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , April 2008 , pp. 327 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Emmerson, A. The impact of surveys on hospital infection. J Hosp Infect 1995;30(suppl):421–440.Google Scholar
2.Vincent-Boulétreau, A, Caillat-Vallet, E, Dumas, AM, et al.Changing medical practices and nosocomial infection rates in French maternity units from 1997 to 2000 [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2005;34:128–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Malavaud, S, Bou-Segonds, E, Berrebi, A, Castagno, R, Assouline, C, Connan, L. Determination of nosocomial infection incidence in mothers and newborns during the early postpartum period [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2003;32:169–174.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Allen, VM, O'Connell, CM, Liston, RM, Basken, TFMaternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:477–482.Google Scholar
5.Holbrook, KF, Nottebart, VF, Hameed, SR, Platt, R. Automated postdischarge surveillance for postpartum and neonatal nosocomial infections. Am J Med 1991;91:125S–130S.Google Scholar
6.Schwartz, M, Wang, C, Eckert, L, Critchlow, C. Risk factors for urinary tract infection in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:547–553.Google Scholar
7.Newton, ER, Prihoda, TJ, Gibbs, RS. A clinical and microbiologic analysis of risk factors for puerperal endometritis. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75(3 pt l):402–406.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Gibbs, RS. Clinical risk factors for puerpueral infection. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55(5 suppl):178S–184S.Google Scholar
9.DuPlessis, HM, Bell, R, Richards, T. Adolescent pregnancy: understanding the impact of age and race on outcomes. J Adolesc Health 1997;20:187–197.Google Scholar
10.Boulay, G, Simon, L, Hamza, J. Analgésie et anesthésie au cours de l'accouchement. In: Encyclopédie Médico-Chirurgicale. Paris, France: Elsevier; 2002: Fascicule: 5-049-L-80.Google Scholar
11.Liu, S, Heaman, M, Joseph, KS, et al.Risk of maternal postpartum read-mission associated with mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:836–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Queuille, E, Girard, R. Qu'est ce qui favorise l'infection urinaire de la femme accouchant par voie basse sous analgésie péridurale? Hygiène S 1999; VIL432–433.Google Scholar
13.Linnemann, C. Nosocomial infections in obstetric Patients. In: Mayhall, C, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1999:729–735.Google Scholar
14.Schuchat, A. Group B streptococcus. Lancet 1999;353:51–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Muller, AE, Oostvogel, PM, Steegers, EA, Dorr, PJ. Morbidity related to maternal group B streptococcal infections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:1027–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Winn, HN. Group B streptococcus infection in pregnancy. Clin Perinatol 2007;34:387–392.Google Scholar
17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: a public health perspective (published correction appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1996;45:679). MMWR Recomm Rep 1996;45(RR-7):1–24.Google Scholar
18.Schrag, S, Gorwitz, R, Fultz-Butts, K, Schuchat, A. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002;51(RR-11):1–22.Google Scholar
19.Prevention of group B streptococcal infection in newborns: recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Can Fam Physician 2002;48:934–935, 944-946.Google Scholar
20.Brozanski, BS, Jones, JG, Krohn, MA, Sweet, RL. Effect of a screening-based prevention policy on prevalence of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:496–501.Google Scholar
21.Benitz, WE, Gould, JB, Druzin, ML. Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: strategy development using decision analysis. Pediatrics 1999;103:e76.Google Scholar
22.Smaili, F. Intrapartum antibiotics for group B streptococcal colonisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2(2):CD000115.Google Scholar
23.Schrag, SJ, Zell, ER, Lynfield, R, et al.A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates. N Engl J Med 2002;347:233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Decreasing incidence of perinatal Group B streptococcal disease—United States, 1993-1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997;46:473–477.Google Scholar
25.Mitchell, A, Steffenson, N, Hogan, H, Brooks, S. Neonatal group B streptococcal disease. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1997;22:249–253.Google Scholar
26.Locksmith, GJ, Clark, P, Duff, P. Maternal and neonatal infection rates with three different protocols for prevention of group B streptococcal disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(2 pt l):416–422.Google Scholar
27.Ministère de l'Emploi et de la Solidarité. Secrétariat d’Etat à la Santé et à l'action sociale, Comité Technique National des Infections Nosocomiales. 100 recommandations pour la surveillance et la prévention des infections nosocomiales. Paris, France: 1999;121.Google Scholar
28.Tissot-Guerraz, F, Thoulon, I, Miellet, C, et al.La surveillance de l'infection en maternité. In: Puech, F, Blanc, B, eds. Herne Journée Nationale de la Société Franļaise de Médecine Périnatale. Paris, France: Arnett; 1993:121–145.Google Scholar
29.Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est. Available at: http://cclin-sudest.chu-lyon.fr. Accessed February 15, 2008.Google Scholar
30.Dumas, A, Girard, R, Vincent-Boulétreau, A, et al. Does intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis decrease the incidence of maternal group B streptococcal infections? J Hosp Infect 2004;58:85–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Garner, J, Jarvis, W, Emori, T, Hogan, T, Hughes, J. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Baker, C, Luce, J, Chenoweth, C, Friedman, C. Comparison of case-finding methodologies for endometritis after cesarean section. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:27–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d’Evaluation en Santé (ANAES). Prévention Anténatale du Risque Infectieux Bactérien Néonatal Précoce: Recommandations pour la Pratique Clinique. Paris, France: ANAES; 2001.Google Scholar
34.Gilstrap, LC 3rd, Ramin, SM. Urinary tract infections during pregnancy Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2001;28:581–591.Google Scholar
35.Wolfe, RR Jr, Norwick, ML, Bofill, JA. Fatal maternal beta-hemolytic group B streptococcal meningitis: a case report. Am J Perinatol 1998;15:597–600.Google Scholar
36.Krohn, MA, Hillier, SL, Baker, CJ. Maternal peripartum complications associated with vaginal group B streptococci colonization. J infect Dis 1999;179:1410–1415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Thinkhamrop, J, Hofmeyr, GJ, Adetoro, O, Lumbiganon, P. Prophylactic antibiotic administration in pregnancy to prevent infectious morbidity and mortality. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;4(4):CD002250.Google Scholar
38.Criscuolo, JL, Kibler, MP, Micholet, S, et al.The value of antibiotic prophylaxis during intrauterine procedures during vaginal delivery: a comparative study of 500 patients [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1990;19:909–918.Google ScholarPubMed
39.Yancey, MK, Duff, P, Clark, P, Kurtzer, T, Frentzen, BH, Kubilis, P. Peripartum infection associated with vaginal group B streptococcal colonization. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:816–819.Google ScholarPubMed
40.Wendel, GD Jr, Leveno, KJ, Sanchez, PJ, Jackson, GL, Mclntire, DD, Siegel, JD. Prevention of neonatal group B streptococcal disease: a combined intrapartum and neonatal protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:618–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar