Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:00:33.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disposal-Related Sharps Injuries at a New York City Teaching Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Andre C. Weltman*
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Louise J. Short
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Meryl H. Mendelson
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
David E. Lilienfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Marge Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Division of Nursing Education, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
*
New York State Department of Health, Room 840 Coming Tower, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12237

Abstract

Objective:

To characterize disposal-related sharps injuries.

Design:

A three-part study including (a) descriptive analysis of disposal-related injuries in a l-year period, (b) 4:l matched case-control study of nurses injured while using sharps disposal containers, and (c) survey to solicit opinions of users of containers.

Setting:

An 1,181-bed teaching hospital in New York City.

Participants:

For epidemiologic analyses, persons with self-reported injuries identified via New York State and Occupational Safety and Health Administration forms and control nurses without self-reported injuries. For survey, convenience sample of hospital nurses, laboratory workers, and maintenance workers.

Main Outcome Measures:

Circumstances of injuries determined by study questionnaires. Employee opinions obtained by questionnaires and discussions during small group sessions.

Results:

Three hundred sixty-one persons reported sharps injuries, of whom 72 (20%) had disposal-related injuries. Persons with disposal-related injuries included four hospital visitors and one patient. Of 67 disposal-related injuries among employees, 25 (37%) directly involved use of a sharps disposal container. Significant risk factors for injury included container height greater than 4 ft above the floor, distance less than 5 ft from site of sharp object use to nearest container, and lack of attendance at universal precautions inservice classes. Survey groups involved 69 employees who identified a variety of preferred features for sharps disposal containers.

Conclusions:

Disposal of sharp objects is an important cause of sharps injuries. Ergonomic factors, worker education, and appropriate container design should be considered in injury prevention strategies. Relevant guidelines and regulations are lacking and are needed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. 1993;6:13.Google Scholar
2. Krasinski, K, LaCouture, R Holzman, RS. Effect of changing needle disposal systems on needle puncture injuries. Infect Control 1987;8:5962.Google Scholar
3. Ribner, BS, Landry, MN, Gholson, GL, Linden, LA. Impact of a rigid, puncture resistant container system upon needlestick injuries. Infect Control 1987;8:6366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Edmond, M, Kbakoo, R McTaggart, B, Solomon, R Effect of bedside needle disposal units on needle recapping frequency and needlestick injury. Infect Control Hasp Epidemiol 1988;9:114116.Google Scholar
5. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH, Brand-Elnaggar, J, Pearson, RD. Rates of needle-stick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital N Engl J Med 1988;319:284288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Linnemann, CC, Cannon, C, DeRonde, M, Lanphear, B. Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and universal precautions on reported needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:214219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Mangione, CM, Gerberding, JL, Cummings, SR Occupational exposure to HIV frequency and rates of underreporting of percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures by medical house staff . Am J Med 1991;90:8590.Google Scholar
8. Mendelson, MH, Short, LJ, Dong, JT, Solomon, J, Meyers, BR Hirschman, SZ. Analysis of sharps injuries at an 1100 bed teaching medical center: priorities for injury reducing devices, presented at the 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 1991; Chicago, IL. Abstract.Google Scholar
9. Sellick, JA, Hazamy, PA, Mylotte, JM. Influence of an educational program and mechanical opening needle disposal boxes on occupational needlestick injuries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:725731.Google Scholar
10. Yassi, A, McGill, M. Determinants of blood and body fluid exposure in a large teaching hospital: hazards of the intermittent intravenous procedure. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:129135.Google Scholar
11. English, JE Reported hospital needlestick injuries in relation to knowledge/skill, design, and management problems. Infect Control Hasp Epidemiol 1992;13:259264.Google Scholar
12. Haiduven, DJ, DeMaio, TM, Stevens, DA. A five-year study of needlestick injuries: significant reduction associated with communication, education, and convenient placement of sharps containers. Infect Control Hasp Epidemiol 1992;13:265271.Google Scholar
13. Department of Labor-Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA bloodborne pathogen standard. (CFR Section 1910.1030) Federal Register. December 6,1991;56:6417564182.Google Scholar
14. Fleiss, JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY Wiley; 1981:123126.Google Scholar
15. Kleinbaum, DG, Kupper, LL, Morgenstern, H. Epidemiologic Research: Principies and Quantitative Methods. New York, NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1982:394397.Google Scholar
16. O’Neill, TM, Abbott, AV, Radecki, SE. Risk of needlesticks and occupational exposures among residents and medical students. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:14511456.Google Scholar