Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:44:01.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic Applications of DNA Probes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Michael A. Pfaller
Michael A. Pfaller*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterans' Affairs Medical Center and Department of Pathology, the University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
*
Department of Pathology, 273 MRC, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of recombinant DNA technology to develop specific molecular (usually DNA) probes has provided medical and veterinary diagnostic laboratories with powerful new tools to enhance the diagnosis of infectious diseases, genetic disorders, and malignancies, as well as more sensitive and specific means to accomplish such tasks as tissue typing and paternity testing. They are also useful as aids in forensic medicine (Table 1). Application of DNA probes as diagnostic reagents may allow laboratories to reduce turnaround time, broaden the spectrum of agents detected, identified and/or quantitated, and reduce costs by simplifying certain labor intensive determinations and allowing laboratories to perform other tests on-site rather than sending specimens to reference laboratories.‘-”

DNA probes are single-stranded pieces of nucleic acid, labeled with a specific tracer (isotope, enzyme, or chromophore), that will hydrogen bond (hybridize) with complementary single-stranded pieces of DNA (or RNA) under the appropriate conditions of pH, temperature, and ionic strength. The stability of the double-stranded complex (hybrid) depends on the degree of complementarity between the two nucleic acid strands. Under stringent conditions (high pH and temperature, low ionic strength), the two strands of an imperfectly matched hybrid will dissociate and the perfectly matched hybrids will remain intact. The hybridization reaction is the basis for any DNA probe assay and consists of four components (Table 2): the probe; the target (the nucleic acid contained in the sample submitted for testing); the detection method, which is based on the specific label or reporter group employed; and the hybridization format.

Type
Topics in Clinical Microbiology
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , February 1991 , pp. 103 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Caskey, CT Disease diagnosis by recombinant DNA methods. Science. 1987;236:1223–1229.Google Scholar
2. Edberg, SC. Principles of nucleic acid hybridization and comparison with monoclonal antibody technology for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Yale J Biol Med. 1985;58:425–442.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Fenoglio-Preiser, CM, Willman, CL. Molecular biology and the pathologist: general orincioles and annlications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987;111:601–619.Google Scholar
4. Highfield, PE, Dougan, G. DNA probes for microbial diagnosis. Med Lab Sci. 1985;42:352–360.Google Scholar
5. Kulski, JK, Norval, M. Nucleic acid probes in diagnosis of viral diseases of man. Arch Virol. 1985;83:3–15.Google Scholar
6. Lowe, JB. Clinical applications of gene probes in human genetic disease, malignancy, and infectious disease. Clin Chem Acta: Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1986;157:1–32.Google Scholar
7. Parsons, G. Development of DNA probe-based commercial assays. J Clin Immunoassay. 1988;11:152–160.Google Scholar
8. Sommer, SS. Application of DNA-based diagnosis to patient care; the example of hemophilia A. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987;62:387–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Steel, CM. DNA in medicine: the tools. Lancet. 1984;15:908–911.Google Scholar
10. Tenover, FC. Diagnostic deoxyribonucleic acid nrobes for infectious disease: Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988;1:82–101.Google Scholar
11. Tenover, F, DNA probes-where are they taking us? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;7:457–459.Google Scholar
12. Dodd, BE. DNA fingerprinting in matters of family and crime. Nature. 1985;318:506–507.Google Scholar
13. Gill, P, Jeffreys, AJ, Warrett, DJ. Forensic application of DNA fingerprints. Nature. 1985;318:577–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Palva, A, Ranki, M. Microbial diagnosis by nucleic acid sandwich hybridization. Clin Lab Med. 1985;5:475–490.Google Scholar
15. Tenover, FC. Studies of antimicrobial resistance genes using DNA probes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;29:721–725.Google Scholar
16. Al-Hakim, HH, Hull, R. Studies towards the development of chemically synthesized non-radioactive biotinylated nucleic acid hybridization probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986; 14:9965–9972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Bryan, RN, Ruth, JL, Smith, RD, LeBon, JM. Diagnosis of clinical samples with synthetic oligonucleotide hybridization probes. In: Leive, L, ed. Microbiology-1986. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1986:113–116.Google Scholar
18. Wallace, RB. Shaffer, J, Murnhv, RF. et al. Hvbridization of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides to X174 DNA. The effect of single base pair mismatch. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;6:3543–3557.Google Scholar
19. Langer-Safer, PR, Levine, M, Ward, D. Enzymatic synthesis of biotin-labeled polynucleotides, novel nucleic acid affinity probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:6633–6637.Google Scholar
20. Rigby, PWJ, Dieckman, M, Rhodes, C, et al. Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mot Biol. 1977;113:237–251.Google Scholar
21. Tchen, P, Fuchs, RPP, Sage, E, Leng, M. Chemically modified nucleic acids as immunodetectable probes in hybridization experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:3466–3470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Brigarti, DJ, Myerson, D, Leary, JJ, et al. Detection of viral genomes in cultured cells and paraffin-embedded tissue sections using biotin-labeled hybridization probes. Virology. 1983;126:32–50.Google Scholar
23. Carter, GI, Towner, KJ, Slack, RCB. Rapid detection of a specific tri-methoprim resistance gene using a biotinylated DNA probe. J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;20:335–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Chan, VTW, Fleming, KA, McGee, JO. Detection of subpicogram quantities of specific DNA sequences on blot hybridization with biotinylated probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985;13:8083–8033.Google Scholar
25. Chollet, A, Kawashima, EH. Biotin-labeled synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides: chemical synthesis and uses as hybridization probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985;13:1529–1541.Google Scholar
26. Jablonski, E, Moomaw, EW, Tullis, RJ, Ruth, JL. Preparation of oligo-deoxynucleotide-alkaline phosphatase conjugates and their use as hybridization probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:6115–6128.Google Scholar
27. Seriwatana, J, Echeverria, P, Taylor, DN, et al. Identification of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli with synthetic alkaline phosphatase-conjugated oligonucleotide probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1438–1441.Google Scholar
28. Matthews, JA, Batki, A, Hynds, C, Kricka, LJ. Enhanced chemilu-minescent method for the detection of DNA dot-hybridization assays. Anal Biochem. 1985;151:205–209.Google Scholar
29. Boguslawski, SJ, Smith, DE, Michalak, MA, et al. Characterization of a monoclonal antibody to DNA-RNA and its application to immunodetection of hybrids. J Immunol Methods. 1986;89:123–130.Google Scholar
30. Niedobitek, G, Finn, T, Herbst, H, et al. Detection of viral DNA by in situ hybridization using bromodeoxvuridine-labeled DNA probes. Am J Pathol. 1988;131:1–4.Google Scholar
31. Hyypia, T, Jalava, A, Larsen, SJ, et al. Detection of Chlamydia truchomatis in clinical specimens by nucleic acid spot hybridization. I Gen Microbiol. 1985:131:975–978.Google Scholar
32. Kidd, AH, Harley, EJ, Erasmus, MJ. Specific detection and typing of adenovirus types 40 and 41 in stool specimens by dot-blot hybridization. I Clin Microbiol. 1985:22:934–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Lanata, CF, Kaper, JB, Baldini, MM, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of DNA probes with the slot blot technique for detection of Escherichia coli enterotoxins. J Infect Dis. 1985;152:1087–1090.10.1093/infdis/152.5.1087Google Scholar
34. Meinkoth, J, Wahl, G. Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid supports. Anal Biochem. 1984;138:267–284.Google Scholar
35. Doebbelinn, BN. Bale, MI. Koontz, FP, et al. Prospective evaluation of the Gen-Probe assay for detection of legionellae in respiratory specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;7:748–752.Google Scholar
36. Edelstein, PH. Evaluation of the Gen-Probe for the detection of legionellae in culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:481–484.Google Scholar
37. Edelstein, PH, Bryan, RN, Enns, RK, et al. Retrospective study of Gen-Probe rapid diagnostic system for detection of legionellae in frozen clinical respiratory tract samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1022–1026.Google Scholar
38. Musial, CE. Tice, LS. Stockman, L. Roberts, GD. Identification of mycobacteria from culture using the Gen-Probe rapid diagnostic system for Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2120–2123.Google Scholar
39. Peterson, EM, Lu, R, Floyd, C, et al. Direct identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium, and Mycobacterium intracellulare from amplified primary cultures in BACTEC media using DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1543–1547.Google Scholar
40. Gissmann, L, Wolnik, L, Ikenberg, H, et al. Human papillomavirus types 6 and 11 DNA sequences in genital and laryngeal papillomas and in some cervical cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:560–563.Google Scholar
41. Pezzella, M, Pezzella, F, Galli, C, et al. In situ hybridization of human immunodeficiency virus (HTLV-III) in cryostat sections of lymph nodes of lymphadenopathy syndrome patients. J Med Virol. 1987;22:135–142.Google Scholar
42. Keath, EJ, Spitzer, ED, Painter, AA, et al. DNA probe for the identification of Histoplasma capsulatum . J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2369–2372.Google Scholar
43. Soll, DR, Staebell, M, Langtimm, C, et al. Multiple Candida strains in the course of a single systemic infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1448–1459.Google Scholar
44. Spector, SA, Neuman, TR, Hirata, KK. Rapid determination of molecular relatedness of isolates of human cytomegalovirus. J Infect Dis. 1985;152:755–759.Google Scholar
45. Yogev, D, Halachmi, D, Kenny, GE, Razin, S. Distinction of species and strains of mycoplasmas (molliculites) by genomic DNA fingerprints with an rRNA gene probe. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1198–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Dimitrov, DH, Graham, DY, Estes, MK. Detection of rotavirus by nucleic acid hybridization with cloned DNA of simian rotavirus SAH genes. J Infect Dis. 1985;152:293–300.Google Scholar
47. Horn, JE, Quinn, T, Hammer, M, et al. Use of nucleic acid probes for the detection of sexually transmitted infectious agents. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986;4:101S–109S.Google Scholar
48. McLaughlin, GL, Edlind, TD, Ihler, GM. Detection of Babesia bovis using DNA hybridization. J Protozool. 1986;33:125–128.Google Scholar
49. Sim, BK, Mak, JW, Cheong, WH, et al. Identification of Brugia malayi in vectors with a species-specific DNA probe. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35:559–564.Google Scholar
50. Schuster, V, Matz, B, Wiegand, H, et al. Nucleic acid hybridization for detection of herpes viruses in clinical specimens. J Med Virol. 1986;19:277–286.Google Scholar
51. Spector, SA, Spector, DJ. The use of DNA probes in studies of human cytomegalovirus. Clin Chem. 1985;31:1514–1520.Google Scholar
52. Gissmann, L. Schneider, A. The role of human papillomavirus in genital cancer. In: dePalo, G, Rilke, F, zurHausen, H, eds. Herpes and Papillomaviruses. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1986:15–25.Google Scholar
53. McCance, DJ. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer, Lancet. 1987;i:986.Google Scholar
54. Ambinder, RF, Wingard, JR, Burns, WH, et al. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in mouthwashes by hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21:353–356.Google Scholar
55. Brechot, C, Hadchouel, M, Scotto, J, et al. State of hepatitis B virus DNA in hepatocytes of patients with HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative liver disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:3906–3910.Google Scholar
56. Sakamoto, H, Zilhao, R, Bismuth, R, et al. Non-radioactive gene probes for the detection of tetracycline and/or minocycline resistance in staphylococci. Mol Cell Probes. 1988;2:321–330.Google Scholar
57. Koch, WC, Adler, SP. Detection of human parvovirus B19 DNA by using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:65–69.Google Scholar
58. Saiki, RK, Scharf, S, Faloona, F, et al. Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985;230:1350–1353.Google Scholar