Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:42:36.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Device-Associated Nosocomial Infection Rates in Intensive Care Units in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sofia Dima
Affiliation:
“Genimatas” General Hospital, Greece
Evangelos I. Kritsotakis
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Maria Roumbelaki
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Simeon Metalidis
Affiliation:
“Ahepa” General Hospital, Greece
Andreas Karabinis
Affiliation:
“Genimatas” General Hospital, Greece
Nina Maguina
Affiliation:
“Konstantopouleion” General Hospital, Greece
Fyllis Klouva
Affiliation:
“Thriasion” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Stamatina Levidiotou
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Epaminondas Zakynthinos
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
John Kioumis
Affiliation:
“Papanikolaou” University Hospital, Thessalonica, Greece
Achilleas Gikas*
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
*
University Hospital of Heraklion 1352/71110, Crete, Greece ([email protected])

Abstract

Site-specific, risk-adjusted incidence rates of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections were obtained through standardized surveillance in 8 ICUs in Greece. High rates were observed for central line-associated bloodstream infection (12.1 infections per 1,000 device-days) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (12.5 infections per 1,000 device-days). Gram-negative microorganisms accounted for 60.4% of the isolates recovered, and Acinetobacter species were predominant. To reduce infection rates in Greek ICUs, comprehensive infection control programs are required.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jarvis, WR. Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:552557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Richards, MJ, Edwards, Jr, Culver, DH, Gaynes, RP. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:510515.Google Scholar
3. Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:1935.Google Scholar
4. Gaynes, R, Culver, DH, Banerjee, S, Edwards, Jr, Henderson, TS. Meaningful interhospital comparisons of infection rates in intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 1993;21:4344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Coello, R, Gastmeier, P, De Boer, AS. Surveillance of hospital-acquired infection in England, Germany, and The Netherlands: will international comparison of rates be possible? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:393397.Google Scholar
6. Gikas, A, Pediaditis, J, Papadakis, JA, et al. Prevalence study of hospital-acquired infections in 14 Greek hospitals: planning from the local to the national surveillance level. J Hosp Infect 2002;50:269275.Google Scholar
7. Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.Google Scholar
8. Orsi, GB, Raponi, M, Franchi, C, Rocco, M, Mancini, C, Venditti, M. Surveillance and infection control in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:321325.Google Scholar
9. Inan, D, Saba, R, Yalcin, AN, et al. Device-associated nosocomial infection rates in Turkish medical-surgical intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:343348.Google Scholar
10. Vincent, JL, Bihari, DJ, Suter, PM, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 1995;274:639644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Vincent, JL. Nosocomial infections in adult intensive-care units. Lancet 2003;361:20682077.Google Scholar
13. Gikas, A, Pediaditis, I, Roumbelaki, M, Troulakis, G, Romanos, J, Tselentis, Y. Repeated multi-centre prevalence surveys of hospital-acquired infection in Greek hospitals. CICNet. Cretan Infection Control Network. J Hosp Infect 1999;41:1118.Google Scholar
14. Agodi, A, Zarrilli, R, Barchitta, M, et al. Alert surveillance of intensive care unit-acquired Acinetobacter infections in a Sicilian hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:241247.Google Scholar
15. Fridkin, SK, Pear, SM, Williamson, TH, Galgiani, JN, Jarvis, WR. The role of understaffing in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:150158.Google Scholar
16. Robert, J, Fridkin, SK, Blumberg, HM, et al. The influence of the composition of the nursing staff on primary bloodstream infection rates in a surgical intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:1217.Google Scholar