Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:27:22.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Caveat Emptor: The Role of Suboptimal Bronchoscope Repair Practices by a Third-Party Vendor in a Pseudo-Outbreak of Pseudomonas in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sara E. Cosgrove*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Polly Ristaino
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Anne Caston-Gaa
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Donna P. Fellerman
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Elaine F. Nowakowski
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Karen C. Carroll
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Jonathan B. Orens
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Trish M. Perl
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Lisa L. Maragakis
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
*
Osler 425, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 ([email protected])

Abstract

Objective.

To describe a pseudo-outbreak associated with loose bronchoscope biopsy ports caused by inadequate bronchoscope repair practices by third-party vendors and to alert healthcare personnel to assess bronchoscope repair practices.

Design.

Outbreak investigation.

Setting.

A 925-bed tertiary care hospital in Baltimore, Maryland.

Patients.

Patients who underwent bronchoscopy with certain bronchoscopes after they had been repaired by a third-party vendor.

Methods.

An epidemiologic investigation was conducted to determine the cause of Pseudomonas putida growth in 4 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens within a 3-day period in May 2008. All bronchoscopes were inspected, and cultures were obtained from bronchoscopes and the environment. Bronchoscope cleaning and maintenance practices were reviewed. Microbiologic results from BAL specimens and medical records were reviewed to find additional cases.

Results.

All 4 case patients had undergone bronchoscopy with one of 2 bronchoscopes, both of which had loose biopsy ports. Bronchoscope cultures grew P. putida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas. The P. putida strains from the bronchoscopes matched those from the patients. Specimens from 12 additional patients who underwent bronchoscopy with these bronchoscopes grew P. putida, P. aeruginosa, or Stenotrophomonas. No patients developed clinical signs or symptoms of infection, but 7 were treated with antibiotics. Investigation revealed that the implicated bronchoscopes had been sent to an external vendor for repair; examination by the manufacturer revealed irregularities in repairs and nonstandard part replacements.

Conclusions.

Third-party vendors without access to proprietary information may contribute to mechanical malfunction of medical devices, which can lead to contamination and incomplete disinfection.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(3):224-229

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kolmos, HJ, Lerche, A, Kristoffersen, K, Rosdahl, VT. Pseudo-outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in HIV-infected patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Scand J Infect Dis 1994;26(6):653657.Google Scholar
2. Shimono, N, Takuma, T, Tsuchimochi, N, et al. An outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections following thoracic surgeries occurring via the contamination of bronchoscopes and an automatic endoscope reprocessor. J Infect Chemother 2008;14(6):418423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Silva, CV, Magalhães, VD, Pereira, CR, Kawagoe, JY, Ikura, C, Ganc, AJ. Pseudo-outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens related to bronchoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24(3):195197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Cêtre, J-C, Nicolle, M-C, Salord, H, et al. Outbreaks of contaminated broncho-alveolar lavage related to intrinsically defective bronchoscopes. J Hosp Infect 2005;61(1):3945.Google Scholar
5. Kirschke, DL, Jones, TF, Craig, AS, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens contamination associated with a manufacturing defect in bronchoscopes. N Engl J Med 2003;348(3):214220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Srinivasan, A, Wolfenden, LL, Song, X, et al. An outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections associated with flexible bronchoscopes. N Engl J Med 2003;348(3):221227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Corne, P, Godreuil, S, Jean-Pierre, H, et al. Unusual implication of biopsy forceps in outbreaks of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and pseudo-infections related to bronchoscopy. J Hosp Infect 2005;61(1):2026.Google Scholar
8. DiazGranados, CA, Jones, MY, Kongphet-Tran, T, et al. Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection associated with contamination of a flexible bronchoscope. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30(6):550555.Google Scholar
9. Rozman, A, Duh, S, Petrinec-Primozic, M, Triller, N. Flexible bronchoscope damage and repair costs in a bronchoscopy teaching unit. Respiration 2009;77(3):325330.Google Scholar
10. Kirkpatrick, MB, Smith, JR, Hoffman, PJ, Middleton, RM III. Bronchoscope damage and repair costs: results of a regional postal survey. Respir Care 1992;37(11):12561259.Google Scholar
11. Lunn, W, Garland, R, Gryniuk, L, Smith, L, Feller-Kopman, D, Ernst, A. Reducing maintenance and repair costs in an interventional pulmonology program. Chest 2005;127(4):13821387.Google Scholar
12. Mehta, AC, Curtis, PS, Scalzitti, ML, Meeker, DP. The high price of bronchoscopy: maintenance and repair of the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Chest 1990;98(2):448454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ, and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/Disinfection_Nov_2008.pdf. Published November 2008. Accessed August 1, 2011.Google Scholar
14. Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33(9):22332239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(5):309332.Google Scholar
16. Aumeran, C, Paillard, C, Robin, F, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida outbreak associated with contaminated water outlets in an oncohaematology paediatric unit. J Hosp Infect 2007;65(1):4753.Google Scholar
17. Perz, JF, Craig, AS, Stratton, CW, Bodner, SJ, Phillips, WE Jr, Schaffner, W. Pseudomonas putida septicemia in a special care nursery due to contaminated flush solutions prepared in a hospital pharmacy. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43(10):53165318.Google Scholar
18. Romney, M, Sherlock, C, Stephens, G, Clarke, A. Pseudo-outbreak of Pseudomonas putida in a hospital outpatient clinic originating from a contaminated commercial anti-fog solution—Vancouver, British Columbia. Can Commun Dis Rep 2000;26(21):183184.Google Scholar