Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:48:19.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brief Report Susceptibility of Filipino Nurses to the Varicella-Zoster Virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Nabil T. Nassar  and
Helen C. Tourna
Nabil T. Nassar*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Helen C. Tourna
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
*
American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following an outbreak of varicella, 18% of a group of 174 young female Filipino nurses ranging in age from 20 to 25 years and working at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUMC) were found susceptible to the varicella-zoster virus; as compared to 3% of a matched group of 133 of their Lebanese colleagues. The level of antibody was determined by the Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Those susceptible were assigned duties in low-risk areas to varicella-zoster in the hospital.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , February 1986 , pp. 71 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Weller, H, Varicella-herpes zoster, in Horsfall, KL, Tamm, I (eds): Viral and Rickettsial Infections of Man, ed 4. Philadelphia, J B Lippincott Co. 1965, pp 915–925.Google Scholar
2.Cohen, A, Textbook of Medical Virology, Oxford and Edinburgh, Blackwell Scientific Pubs, 1969, p 550.Google Scholar
3.Grose, C, Edwards, DP, Friedrichs, WE, et al: Monoclonal antibodies against three major glycoproteins of varicella zoster virus. Infect Immun 1983;40(1:381–388.Google Scholar
4.Hyams, PJ, Stewe, MCS, Heitzer, V, Herpes zoster causing varicella (chicken-pox) in hospital employees: Cost of a casual attitude. Am J Infect Control 1984;12(1:2–5.Google Scholar
5.Broadbent, WH, Case of a herpetic eruption in the course of branches of the plexus, followed by partial paralysis in corresponding motor nerves. Br Med J 1966;2:460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Miller, LH, Bruiteli, PH, Zoster reinfection or activation oflatent virus. Am J Med 1970;49:480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Shigeta, S, Yokota, T, Twabuchi, T, et al: Comparative eflicacy of anti-herpes drugs against various strains of varicella zoster virus, J Infect Dis 1983:147(3):576–584.Google Scholar
8.Venkitaraman, AR, John, TJ, Chickenpox outbreak in staff and students of a hospital in the tropics. Lancet 1982;2:165.Google Scholar
9.Hastie, IR, Varicella-zoster virus affecting immigrant nurses. Lancet 1980;2:154–155.Google Scholar
10.Maretic, AA, Cooray, MPM, Comparisons between chickenpox in a tropical and a European country. J Trop Med Hyg 1963;66:311.Google Scholar
11.Sinha, DP, Chickenpox: A disease primarily affecting adults in rural West Bengal, India. Int J Epidemiol 1976;5:367–374.Google Scholar
12.Gershon, AA, Raker, R, Steiberg, S, et al: Antibodies to varicella-zoster virus in parturient women and their of fspring during the first vear of life. Pediatrics 1976;58(5:692–696.Google Scholar
13.Bang, FB, Epidemiological interference. Int J Epidemiol 1975;4:337.Google Scholar
14.Ross, AH, Lenchner, E, Reitman, G, Modification of chickenpox in family contacts by administration of gammaglobulin. N Engl J Med 1962;267:369–376.Google Scholar
15.Preblud, SR. D'Angelo, LJ, Chickenpox in the United Slates 1972-1977. J Infect Dis 1979;140:257–260.Google Scholar
16.Morens, DM, Bregman, DJ, West, CM, et al: An outbreak of varicella zoster virus infection among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 1980;93(3):414–419.Google Scholar