Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:40:50.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Appropriateness of Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheters in Patients Admitted to the Medical Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Rajika L. Munasinghe ,
Habeeb Yazdani ,
Mohamed Siddique  and
Wasif Hafeez
Rajika L. Munasinghe*
Affiliation:
Sinai-Grace Hospital, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
Habeeb Yazdani
Affiliation:
Sinai-Grace Hospital, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
Mohamed Siddique
Affiliation:
Sinai-Grace Hospital, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
Wasif Hafeez
Affiliation:
Sinai-Grace Hospital, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
*
Department of Medicine, Sinai-Grace Hospital, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, 6071 West Outer Dr, Detroit, MI 48235
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Of 836 medical admissions evaluated over a 1-month period, 89 (10.7%) had a urinary catheter placed within 24 hours; 34 placements (38%) had no justifiable indication. Risk for inappropriate catheterization was independent of age, gender, functional status, and mental status at admission. Preventive measures should focus on increasing awareness among healthcare providers.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 22 , Issue 10 , October 2001 , pp. 647 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kreger, BE, Craven, DE, Carting, PC, McCabe, WR. Gram-negative bacteremia, III: reassessment of etiology, epidemiology and ecology in 612 patients. Am J Med 1980;68:332–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Steel, K, Gertman, PM, Crescenzi, C, Anderson, J. Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. N Engl J Med 1981;304:638–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Saint, S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:68–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Piatt, R, Polk, BF, Murdock, B, Rosner, B. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl f Med 1982;307:637–642.Google Scholar
5. Burman, LG, Fryklund, B, Nystrom, B. Use of indwelling urinary tract catheters in Swedish hospitals. Infect Control 1987;8:507–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Gardam, MA, Amihod, B, Orenstein, P, Consolacion, N, Miller, MA. Overutilization of indwelling urinary catheters and the development of nosocomial urinary tract infections. Clinical Performance and Quality Health Care 1998;6:99–102.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Jain, P, Parada, JP, David, A, Smith, LG. Overuse of die indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1425–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Marron, KR, Fillit, H, Peskowitz, M, Silverstone, FA. The nonuse of urethral catheterization in me management of urinary incontinence in the teaching nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc 1983;31:278–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Brandberg, A, Seeberg, S, Bergstrom, G, Nordqvist, P. Reducing the number of nosocomial gram-negative strains by using high absorbing pads as an alternative to indwelling catheters in long-term care—a preliminary study. J Hosp Infect 1980;1:245–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Tambyah, PA. Maki, DG. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1,497 catheterized patients. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:678–682.Google Scholar