Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:50:56.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antimicrobial efficacy and durability of copper formulations over one year of hospital use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

Elizabeth Ann Bryce ,
Billie Velapatino ,
Tysha Donnelly-Pierce ,
Hamed Akbari Khorami ,
Titus Wong ,
Richard Dixon ,
Edouard Asselin ,
Allison McGeer ,
Jocelyn A. Srigley  and
Kevin Katz
Elizabeth Ann Bryce*
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Billie Velapatino
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Tysha Donnelly-Pierce
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Hamed Akbari Khorami
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Titus Wong
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Richard Dixon
Affiliation:
Materials Coordinator, Coalition Healthcare Acquired Infection Reduction (CHAIR) Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Edouard Asselin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Allison McGeer
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Infection Control Mount Sinai, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jocelyn A. Srigley
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Division of Microbiology, Virology, and Infection Control, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Kevin Katz
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Elizabeth Ann Bryce, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate 3 formulations of copper (Cu)-based self-sanitizing surfaces for antimicrobial efficacy and durability over 1 year in inpatient clinical areas and laboratories.

Design:

Randomized control trial.

Setting:

We assessed 3 copper formulations: (1) solid alloy 80% Cu–20% Ni (integral copper), (2) spray-on 80% Cu–20% Ni (spray-on) and (3) 16% composite copper-impregnated surface (CIS). In total, 480 coupons (1 cm2) of the 3 products and control surgical grade (AISI 316) stainless steel were inserted into gaskets and affixed to clinical carts used in patient care areas (including emergency and maternity units) and on microbiology laboratory bench work spaces (n = 240). The microbial burden and assessment of resistance to wear, corrosion, and material compatibility were determined every 3 months. Participants included 3 tertiary-care Canadian adult hospital and 1 pediatric-maternity hospital.

Results:

Copper formulations used on inpatient units statistically significantly reduced bacterial bioburden compared to stainless steel at months 3 and 6. Only the integral copper product had significantly less bacteria than stainless steel at month 12. No statistically significant differences were detected in microbial burden between copper formulations and stainless-steel coupons on microbiology laboratory benches where bacterial counts were low overall. All mass changes and corrosion rates of the formulations were acceptable by engineering standards.

Conclusions:

Copper surfaces vary in their antimicrobial efficacy after 1 year of hospital use. Frequency of cleaning and disinfection influence the impact of copper; the greatest reduction in microbial bioburden occurred in clinical areas compared to the microbiology laboratory where cleaning and disinfection were performed multiple times daily.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 79 - 87
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Salgado, CD, Sepkowitz, KA, John, JF, et al. Copper surfaces reduce the rate of healthcare-acquired infections in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:479–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbarth, S, Maiwald, M, Dancer, SJ. The environment and healthcare-acquired infections: why accurate reporting and evaluation of biological plausibility are important. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:996–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salgado, CD, Sepkowitz, KA, John, JF, et al. Reply to Harbarth et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:997–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpanen, TJ, Casey, AL, Lambert, PA, et al. The antimicrobial efficacy of copper alloy furnishing in the clinical environment: a crossover study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:3–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA. Self-disinfecting surfaces. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:10–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worthington, T, Karpanem, T, Casey, A, Lambert, P, Elliott, T. Reply to Weber and Rutala. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:645–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prado, V, Duran, C, Crestto, M, et al. Effectiveness of copper contact surfaces in reducing the microbial burden (MB) in the intensive care units (ICU) of Hospital del Cobre, Calama Chile. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, PA, Schmidt, MG. Control and mitigation of healthcare-acquired infections: designing clinical trials to evaluate new materials and technologies. Health Environments Research & Design Journal 2011;1:94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, EA, Velapatino, B, Akbari Khorami, H, et al. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and durability of three copper surfaces used in healthcare. Biointerphases 2020;15:011005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Biosafety Handbook, Second Edition. Government of Canada website. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/canadian-biosafety-standards-guidelines/handbook-second-edition.html Published 2016. Accessed October 27, 2020.Google Scholar
Standard practice for preparing, cleaning, and evaluating corrosion test specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials website. https://www.astm.org/Standards/G1 Published 2017. Accessed October 27, 2020.Google Scholar
Dancer, SJ. How do we assess hospital cleaning? A proposal for microbiological standards for surface hygiene in hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2004;56:10–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero, DA, Arellano, C, Pardo, M, et al. Antimicrobial properties of a novel copper-based composite coating with potential for use in healthcare facilities. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019;8:3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, et al. Continuous room decontamination technologies. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:A72–A78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, M, Klingelschmitt, F, Charpentier, E, et al. Copper alloy touch surfaces in healthcare facilities: an effective solution to prevent bacterial spreading. Materials 2018;11:2479–2489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, MG, Attaway, HH, Fairey, SE, et al. Self-disinfecting copper beds sustain terminal cleaning and disinfection effects throughout patient care. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019; 86:e01886-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, MG, von Dessauer, B, Benavente, C, et al. Copper surfaces are associated with significantly lower concentrations of bacteria on selected surfaces within a pediatric intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2016; 44:203–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, EH, Hassan, HM, El-Sherbiny, NM, Soliman, AMA. Bacteriological monitoring of inanimate surfaces and equipment in some referral hospitals in Assiut City, Egypt. Int J Micro 2019;5907507.Google ScholarPubMed
Bhatta, RD, Hamal, D, Shrestha, R, et al. Bacterial contamination of frequently touched objects in tertiary-care hospital of Pokhara, Nepal: how safe are our hands? Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018;7:97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnes, SL, Caves, V, Keevil, CW. Mechanism of copper surface toxicity in Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella involves immediate membrane depolarization followed by slower rate of DNA destruction which differs from that observed for gram-positive bacteria. Environ Microbiol 2012;14:1730–1743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solioz, M. Copper homeostasis in gram-positive bacteria. In: Solioz, M, Copper and Bacteria, First Edition. London: Springer; 2018:21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elguindi, J, Moffitt, S, Hasman, H, et al. Metallic copper corrosion rates, moisture content, and growth medium influence survival of copper ion-resistant bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011;89:1963–1970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Bryce et al. supplementary material

Bryce et al. supplementary material

Download Bryce et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.6 KB