Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:43:51.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Outbreak of Pichia anomala Fungemia in a Brazilian Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Alessandro Comarú Pasqualotto ,
Teresa Cristina Teixeira Sukiennik ,
Luiz Carlos Severo ,
Cledja Soares de Amorim  and
Arnaldo Lopes Colombo
Alessandro Comarú Pasqualotto*
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Infection Control, Santa Casa Complexo Hospitalar, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Teresa Cristina Teixeira Sukiennik
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Santa Casa Complexo Hospitalar, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Luiz Carlos Severo
Affiliation:
Clinical Mycology Laboratory, Santa Casa Complexo Hospitalar, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Cledja Soares de Amorim
Affiliation:
Mycology Laboratory, Hospital São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Arnaldo Lopes Colombo
Affiliation:
Mycology Laboratory, Hospital São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
1/512 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BT, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To report an outbreak of Pichia anomala fungemia that occurred in a Brazilian pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) from October 2002 to January 2004.

Design:

Unmatched case-control study.

Methods:

We randomly selected four control-patients for each case-patient from a list of all patients admitted to the ICU for at least 48 hours during the outbreak. A second control group was composed of all consecutive patients with nosocomial candidemia in the ICU during the outbreak. An environmental study was performed, and genetic relatedness among the clinical isolates was characterized by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA assay.

Results:

During the study period, 1,046 children were admitted to the pediatric ICU, 17 of whom developed P. anomala fungemia (attack rate, 1.6%). The median age was 1.1 years, and the main underlying conditions were congenital malformations (35.3%) and neoplastic diseases (11.8%). The overall mortality rate was 41.2%. Two patients received no antifungal treatment; all of the others were treated with amphotericin B. On multivariate analysis, only the presence of a central venous catheter was significantly associated with P. anomala fungemia. The yeast was not found on healthcare workers' hands or in the environment. Molecular studies showed that the outbreak was caused by a single strain. The distribution of risk factors was similar between patients with P. anomala fungemia and control-patients with candidemia.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the importance of P. anomala as an emerging nosocomial fungal pathogen. Patients with P. anomala fungemia seem to have risk factors in common with those who have candidemia.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , June 2005 , pp. 553 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chakrabarti, A, Singh, K, Narang, A, et al.Outbreak of Pichia anomala infection in the pediatric service of a tertiary-care center in Northern India. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:1702–1706.Google Scholar
2.Murphy, N, Damjanovic, V, Hart, CA, Buchanan, CR, Whitaker, R, Cooke, RWI. Infection and colonization of neonates by Hansenula anomala. Lancet 1986;1:291–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest 1992;101:1644–1655.Google Scholar
4.Isenberg, HD, ed. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, ed. 2. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004.Google Scholar
5.Strausbaugh, LJ, Sewell, DL, Tjoelker, RC, et al.Comparison of three methods for recovery of yeasts from hands of health-care workers. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:471–473.Google Scholar
6.Sehulster, L, Chinn, RY, CDC, HICPAC. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;6;52(RR-10):1–42.Google Scholar
7.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2002. Approved standard M27-A2.Google Scholar
8.Wach, A, Pick, H, Phillipsen, P. Procedures for isolating yeast DNA for different purposes. In: Johnston, JR, ed. Molecular Genetics of Yeast. Oxford: IRL Press at Oxford University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
9.Melo, ASA, Almeida, LP, Colombo, AL, Briones, MRS. Evolutionary distances and identification of Candida species in clinical isolates by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Mycopathologia 1998; 142:57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Colombo, AL, Melo, AS, Crespo Rosas, RF, et al.Outbreak of Candida rugosa candidemia: an emerging pathogen that may be refractory to amphotericin B therapy. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;46:253–257.Google Scholar
11.Thuler, LCS, Faivichenco, S, Velasco, E, Martins, CA, Nascimento, CRG, Castilho, IAMA. Fungemia caused by Hansenula anomala: an outbreak in a cancer hospital. Mycoses 1997;40:193–196.Google Scholar
12.Aragão, PA, Oshiro, IC, Manrique, EI, et al.Pichia anomala outbreak in a nursery: exogenous source? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:843–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Mestroni, SC, Bava, AL. Hansenula anomala fungemia. Rev Argent Microbiol 2003;35:54–56.Google Scholar
14.Kalenic, S, Jandrlic, M, Vegar, V, Zuech, N, Sekulic, A, Mlinaric-Missoni, E. Hansenula anomala outbreak at a surgical intensive care unit: a search for risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol 2001;17:491–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Bagley, SC, White, H, Golomb, BA. Logistic regression in the medical literature: standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:979–985.Google Scholar