Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Connelly, Brian S.
Ones, Deniz S.
Ramesh, Anuradha
and
Goff, Maynard
2008.
A Pragmatic View of Assessment Center Exercises and Dimensions.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
Lievens, Filip
2008.
What Does Exercise-Based Assessment Really Mean?.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
112.
Schuler, Heinz
2008.
Improving Assessment Centers by the Trimodal Concept of Personnel Assessment.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
128.
Ryan, Ann Marie
and
Huth, Megan
2008.
Not much more than platitudes? A critical look at the utility of applicant reactions research.
Human Resource Management Review,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
119.
Moses, Joel
2008.
Assessment Centers Work, but for Different Reasons.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
134.
Melchers, Klaus G.
and
König, Cornelius J.
2008.
It Is Not Yet Time to Dismiss Dimensions in Assessment Centers.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
125.
Arthur, Winfred
Day, Eric Anthony
and
Woehr, David J.
2008.
Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
105.
Rupp, Deborah E.
Thornton, George C.
and
Gibbons, Alyssa M.
2008.
The Construct Validity of the Assessment Center Method and Usefulness of Dimensions as Focal Constructs.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
116.
Howard, Ann
2008.
Making Assessment Centers Work the Way They Are Supposed To.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
98.
Jones, Robert G.
and
Klimoski, Richard J.
2008.
Narrow Standards for Efficacy and the Research Playground: Why Either–Or Conclusions Do Not Help.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Brannick, Michael T.
2008.
Back to Basics of Test Construction and Scoring.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
131.
Dilchert, Stephan
and
Ones, Deniz S.
2009.
Assessment Center Dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta‐analytic incremental validity.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
254.
Büttner, Oliver B.
and
Florack, Arnd
2009.
Empirische Mastertechniken.
p.
167.
Gibbons, Alyssa Mitchell
and
Rupp, Deborah E.
2009.
Dimension Consistency as an Individual Difference: A New (Old) Perspective on the Assessment Center Construct Validity Debate.
Journal of Management,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 5,
p.
1154.
Thornton, George C.
and
Gibbons, Alyssa M.
2009.
Validity of assessment centers for personnel selection.
Human Resource Management Review,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
169.
VAN IDDEKINGE, CHAD H.
FERRIS, GERALD R.
and
HEFFNER, TONIA S.
2009.
TEST OF A MULTISTAGE MODEL OF DISTAL AND PROXIMAL ANTECEDENTS OF LEADER PERFORMANCE.
Personnel Psychology,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 3,
p.
463.
HOFFMAN, BRIAN J.
and
WOEHR, DAVID J.
2009.
DISENTANGLING THE MEANING OF MULTISOURCE PERFORMANCE RATING SOURCE AND DIMENSION FACTORS.
Personnel Psychology,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 4,
p.
735.
BRUMMEL, BRADLEY J.
RUPP, DEBORAH E.
and
SPAIN, SETH M.
2009.
CONSTRUCTING PARALLEL SIMULATION EXERCISES FOR ASSESSMENT CENTERS AND OTHER FORMS OF BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT.
Personnel Psychology,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Kersting, Martin
2009.
Qualität im Assessment Center.
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
70.
Lievens, Filip
Tett, Robert P.
and
Schleicher, Deidra J.
2009.
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management.
Vol. 28,
Issue. ,
p.
99.