Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T10:44:42.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who says what (and how) to whom: A multilevel approach to improving workplace bias training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2020

Kevin L. Zabel  and
Keith L. Zabel
Kevin L. Zabel*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin La Crosse
Keith L. Zabel
Affiliation:
Ford Motor Company
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 230 - 235
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., & Jehn, K.A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1227–1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude-behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 522–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. R., Mayle, K., Mabbott, L., & Napper, L. (2007). Self-affirmation reduces smokers’ defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels. Health Psychology, 26, 437–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, T. L., Kaylor, L. E., & Oltman, K. A. (2020). Coffee and controversy: How applied psychology can revitalize sexual harassment and racial discrimination training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(2), XXX–XXX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, M. M. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. S., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Getting acquainted in interracial interactions: Avoiding intimacy but approaching race. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 557–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 565–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2002). Implicit acquisition and manifestation of classically conditioned attitudes. Social Cognition, 20, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., Sherif, C. W., & others. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Vol. 10). Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
Trawalter, S., & Richeson, J. A. (2008). Let’s talk about race, baby! When whites’ and blacks’ interracial contact experiences diverge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1214–1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zabel, K. L. (2015). The roles of self-affirmation and introspection in correction for automatic prejudice. Unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
Zabel, K. L., & Olson, M. A. (2011). Effects of Whites’ interracial interaction content strategies on Blacks’ impressions. Poster presented at the 23rd annual convention of the Association for Psychological Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar