Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:36:26.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whither I-O Psychology and Legislative Restrictions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

Tammy D. Allen  and
Howard M. Weiss
Tammy D. Allen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida
Howard M. Weiss
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Georgia Tech
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tammy D. Allen, Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., PCD4118G, Tampa, FL 33620. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We think that before reading our reactions to the focal article, readers should be aware of the history of the Licensure of Consulting and I-O Psychologists (LCIOP) Joint Task Force. The Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) initiated the LCIOP, and the objectives of the task force were developed without input from Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). In June 2013, Don Crowder informed Mark Nagy (SIOP Chair of State Affairs) that the ASPPB approved the establishment of a joint task force related to licensure of consulting and industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists. The membership composition of the task force was determined by ASPPB, and SIOP was allotted one member. By including a member of SIOP, ASPPB can describe the task force as a cooperative effort and SIOP ostensibly has the opportunity to help shape recommendations made with regard to the licensure of I-O psychologists. Don Crowder now serves as the president of ASPPB. In Crowder's October 2016 ASPPB meeting address, he encouraged jurisdictions to review their statutes, and, if permitted, require licensure for both health service providers (HSPs) and general applied psychologists (GAPs).

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 194 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. D. (2015). Connections past and present: Bringing our scientific influence into focus. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 52 (3), 126–133.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (APA). (2015). Division profiles by division. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/about/division/officers/services/profiles.aspx.Google Scholar
Caulder, M. (2016, March 17). State looks to remove 15 licensing boards. Retrieved from http://nccapitolconnection.com/2016/03/17/state-looks-to-remove-15-licensing-boards/ Google Scholar
Campbell, J., Levy, P., Murphy, K., Schmitt, N., & Weiss, H. (2009). Letter to the SIOP Executive Committee. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 46 (4). http://www.siop.org/tip/April09/02campbell.aspx.Google Scholar
Crowder, D. L. (2016). Game plan. Tyrone, GA: ASBBP.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. (2000, January). A message from your president. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 37 (3). http://www.siop.org/TIP/backissues/TipJan00/1DeNisi.aspx.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Licensure of Consulting and I-O Psychologists (LCIOP) Joint Task Force. (2017). The licensure issue in consulting and I-O psychology: A discussion paper. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (2), 144–181.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, P. A., Ellig, J., & Shamoun, D. Y. (2014). Regulatory reform in Florida: An opportunity for greater competitiveness and economic efficiency. Florida State University Business Review 13, 96–127.Google Scholar
Modernpsychologist.com. (2016). State board psychologists allegedly received kickbacks from the ASPPB, per IRS complaint. Retrieved from http://www.modernpsychologist.com/state-board-psychologists-allegedly-received-kickbacks-asppb-per-irs-complaint/.Google Scholar
Modernpsychologist.com. (2017). The #1 watchdog in the field of psychology. Retrieved from http://www.modernpsychologist.com/about/.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. (2013). A message from your president. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 50 (3). http://www.siop.org/tip/Jan13/01_reynolds.aspx.Google Scholar
Rosemond v. Markham et al. No. 13:13-cv-00042 (Kentucky Eastern District Court, September 30, 2015).Google Scholar
SIOP Administrative Office. (2014, January 22). No, I-O psychologists are not therapists. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/article_view.aspx?article=1213.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1991). The wealth of nations (Everyman's Library edition). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sweigart, J. (2016, November 15). Bill would abolish boards, overhaul professional licensing in Ohio. Retrieved from http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/state–regional-govt–politics/bill-would-abolish-boards-overhaul-professional-licensing-ohio/rLcsn8Cp2fMpD148ow1PwL/ Google Scholar
Wax-Thibodeaux, E. (2014). For psychologists who tend to federal employees, there's a lot to work through. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-psychologists-who-tend-to-federal-employees-theres-a-lot-to-work-through/2014/01/13/307a9e58-770c-11e3-b1c5-739e63e9c9a7_story.html?goback=.anb_72806_*2_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1&utm_term=.6298dc9b648d#! Google Scholar