Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:46:29.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What makes jobs too dissimilar to compare in a pay equity analysis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2022

Michael G. Aamodt*
Affiliation:
DCI Consulting Group
Cliff Haimann
Affiliation:
DCI Consulting Group
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Finke v. Trustees of Purdue University, 2014 WL 2938384 (N.D. Ind. <LQ_GJAZRF>2014</LQ_GJAZRF>).2014).>Google Scholar
Jacobs v. College of William and Mary, 517 F. Supp. 791 (E.D. Va. 1980).Google Scholar
Sady, K., & Aamodt, M. G. (2016, August). We might be paid differently, but are our jobs really the same? [Conference presentation]. National Industry Liaison Group.Google Scholar
Sady, K., Aamodt, M. G., & Cohen, D. (2015). Compensation equity: Who, what, when, where, why, and how. In Hanvey, C. and Sady, K. (Eds.), Practitioner’s guide to legal issues in organizations (pp. 251272). Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11143-8_10 Google Scholar
Spaulding v. University of Washington, 740 F.2d 686 (9th Cir. 1984).Google Scholar
Strah, N., Rupp, D. E., & Morris, S. (2021). Job analysis and job classification for addressing pay inequity in organizations: Adjusting our methods within a shifting legal landscape. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspective on Science and Practice, 15(1), 145.Google Scholar