Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:39:46.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Trouble With JDM: Some Limitations to the Influence of JDM on Organizational Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Barry M. Staw*
Affiliation:
University of California
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brockner, J., & Rubin, J. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2005). Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organization Science, 16, 434447. Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It's all about me: Narcissistic CEOs and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 351386. Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Bonaccio, S., Highhouse, S., Ilgen, D., Mohammed, S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2010). What if industrial–organizational psychology decided to take workplace decisions seriously? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 386405.Google Scholar
Hayward, M., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 103127. Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255275. Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In Murphy-Berman, V. & Berman, J. (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 49, pp. 157). Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Schwartz, B. (2010). Does choice mean freedom and well-being? Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 344355.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowledge: Its implications for innovation and reform in psychological research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 947. Google Scholar
Moore, D. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2008). The case for behavioral decision research in organizational behavior. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 399431. Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
Ross, J., & Staw, B. M. (1986). Expo 86: An escalation prototype. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 274297. Google Scholar
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment toward a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 2749. Google Scholar
Staw, B. M. (1997). The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. In Shapira, Z. (Ed.), Organizational decision making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Staw, B. M., Barsade, S. G., & Koput, K. W. (1997). Escalation at the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives' recognition and write off of problem loans. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 130142. Google Scholar
Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474–449.Google Scholar
Staw, B. M., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Macro organizational psychology. In Murnighan, J. K. (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 297332). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar