Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:24:35.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Professional Associations in Promoting Robust Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Brendan Neuman
Brendan Neuman*
Affiliation:
Basil Assessment, LLC.
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Brendan Neuman, Basil Assessment, LLC, 3414 S Union Ave., Chicago, IL 60616. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Grand et al. (2018) address an important and timely concern with scientific research with implications well beyond industrial and organizational (I-O) psychological science. As they describe a comprehensive ecosystem responsible for robust science, they have alluded to the notorious scientist–practitioner gap in our field. In this commentary I propose how that gap relates to the various stakeholders in Grand et al.’s ecosystem, and suggest professional associations take on an elevated role in the communication of science.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 71 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grand, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, T. D., Landis, R. S., Reynolds, D. H., Scott, J. C., . . . Truxillo, D. M. (2018). A systems-based approach to fostering robust science in industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (1), 4–42.Google Scholar