Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:10:56.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Profession Awry or Poised for the Future? Work Psychology and Professional Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ann Marie Ryan  and
J. Kevin Ford
Ann Marie Ryan*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
J. Kevin Ford
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 333 Psychology Bldg., East Lansing, MI 48824-1116
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The commentaries provided an array of perspectives on identity management in our profession. However, there was general agreement on what should be central and distinctive about our field and on the need to cultivate a positive identity for the profession. The commentators also suggested a number of ways to cultivate this identity. For us, the commentaries also stimulated further reflection on our approach to training graduate students. We share our reflections and encourage readers to take the time to reflect on their own efforts to contribute to the profession's management of identity.

Type
Response
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 300 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.

A lack of agreement over our name most definitely does reflect something about an evolving identity. We most often hear organizational psychologist adopted by our colleagues, so we adopted it in our initial article. For the sake of trying out another advocated alternative that we like, we use work psychology here.

References

Avedon, M., Rand, I., & Grabow, K. (2010). Leading human resource functions as organizational psychologists. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 266–268.Google Scholar
Costanza, D. P., & Jensen, J. M. (2010). The fifth scenario: Identity expansion in organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 281–285.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. J. L. (2010). You lost me at hello: Aren't we I-O psychologists still? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 262–265.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35, 265–293.Google Scholar
Grodzins, M. (1958). The metropolitan area as a racial problem. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
Knapp, D. J. (2010). Who are we without the I, or the O, or the P? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 259–261.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010). Industrial-organizational psychology's recurring identity crises: It's a values issue! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 293–299.Google Scholar
Muchinsky, P. M. (2010). A means not an end. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 269–271.Google Scholar
Pinto, J., & Stacey, P. (2010). What's in a name? Just the essence of one's professional identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 277–280.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. B., & Landers, R. N. (2010). Strengthening shared identity in I-O psychology through online social networks. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 286–288.Google Scholar
Shanock, L. R., Rogelberg, S. G., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). A view into the future of organizational psychology: Our experiences with an interdisciplinary approach to graduate education. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 272–276.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 219–234.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A. (2010). A sense of identity does matter in achieving relevance and meaning in our work. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 289–292.Google Scholar