Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:00:43.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The price of technology is responsibility: A discussion of threats created by cybervetting that employers must address to ensure equal employment opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2022

William G. Obenauer Open the ORCID record for William G. Obenauer [Opens in a new window]
William G. Obenauer*
Affiliation:
University of Maine, Maine Business School, Orono, Maine, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 348 - 351
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1992). A technical assistance manual on the employment provisions (Title I) of the Americans with Disabilities Act. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/technical-assistance-manual-employment-provisions-title-i-americans-disabilities-act Google Scholar
Henderson, R. (1991). Addiction as disability: The protection of alcoholics and drug addicts under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Vanderbilt Law Review, 44(3), 713–740.Google Scholar
Holmes, O., IV. (2020). Police brutality and four other ways racism kills Black people. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 39(7), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-06-2020-0151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, J. S., Levine, D. I., & Joshi, A. (2004). Do birds of a feather shop together? The effects on performance of employees’ similarity with one another and with customers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.267 Google Scholar
Mook, J. R., & Powell, E. E. (1996). Substance abuse and the ADA: What every employer should know. Employee Relations Law Journal, 22(2), 57–78.Google Scholar
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2021). Understanding alcohol use disorder. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Alcohol_Use_Disorder.pdf Google Scholar
Obenauer, W. G., & Langer, N. (2019). Inclusion is not a slam dunk: Astudy of differential leadership outcomes in the absence of a glass cliff. Leadership Quarterly, 30(6), Article 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Justice. (2020). Questions and answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and hiring police officers. https://www.ada.gov/copsq7a.htm#:∼:text=An individual with alcohol use, individual with alcohol use disorderGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, A., Damarin, A. K., & McDonald, S. (2022). Is cybervetting valuable? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(3), 315–333.Google Scholar