Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:09:36.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance Management: Process Perfection or Process Utility?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Edward M. Mone*
Affiliation:
CA Technologies
Bennett Price
Affiliation:
CA Technologies
Christina Eisinger
Affiliation:
CA Technologies
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: 6 Sands Court, Port Washington, NY 11050

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cascio, W. F. (1982). Applied psychology in personnel management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Professional. Google Scholar
Mone, E. M., Acritani, K., & Eisinger, C. (2009). Take it to the roundtable. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 425429. Google Scholar
Mone, E. M., & London, M. (2002). Fundamentals of performance management. London: Spiro Press. Google Scholar
Mone, E. M., & London, M. (2010). Employee engagement through effective performance management: A practical guide for managers. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., & O’Leary, R. S. (2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 146164.Google Scholar