Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7pht Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T07:42:26.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maladaptive Personality Constructs, Measures, and Work Behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Stephan Dilchert ,
Deniz S. Ones  and
Robert F. Krueger
Stephan Dilchert
Affiliation:
Baruch College, CUNY
Deniz S. Ones*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Robert F. Krueger
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 98 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.Google Scholar
De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., & Mervielde, I. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 639–657.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). ADA Enforcement Guidance: Preemployment Disability-Related Questions and Medical Examinations (pp. 1–25). Retrieved from www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/medfin5.pdf?Google Scholar
Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, R. T., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan development survey manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Hogan, R. T., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Kaiser, R. B. (2013). Employability and career success: Bridging the gap between theory and reality. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 3–16.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F. (1999). The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 921.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111–133.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (in press). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically-based approach to classifying personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Clark, L. A., Watson, D., Markon, K. E., Derringer, J., … Livesley, W. J. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170–191.Google Scholar
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.Google Scholar
Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kuramoto, J., Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Greiner, L., & Regier, D. A. (2013). DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, part III: Development and reliability testing of cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 71–82.Google Scholar
O'Boyle, E. H. Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, B. P., & Dyce, J. A. (2001). Rigid and extreme: A geometric representation of personality disorders in five-factor model space. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1119–1130.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2013). Counterproductive work behaviors: Concepts, measurement, and nomological network. In Geisinger, K. F. (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (pp. 643–659). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Samuel, D. B., Simms, L. J., Clark, L. A., Livesley, W. J., & Widiger, T. A. (2010). An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, Treatment, 1, 5–21.Google Scholar
Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT-PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepp, S. D., Yu, L., Miller, J. D., Hallquist, M. N., Trull, T. J., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2012). Integrating competing dimensional models of personality. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, K. E., Roberts, B. W., Krueger, R. F., Blonigen, D. M., & Hicks, B. M. (2008). Capturing abnormal personality with normal personality inventories: An item response theory approach. Journal of Personality, 76, 1623–1647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312–326.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T. (1994). Personality and personality disorders. Journal Abnormal Psychology, 103, 78–91.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110–130.Google Scholar
Wille, B., De Fruyt, F., & De Clercq, B. (2013). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of five-factor model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66, 173–223.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (in press). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory Research and Treatment.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–957.Google Scholar