Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7pht Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T07:42:25.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maladaptive Personality at Work: Exploring the Darkness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Nigel Guenole
Nigel Guenole*
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London Kenexa, an IBM company
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Institute of Management Studies, New Academic Building, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Important changes in how personality is conceptualized and measured are occurring in clinical psychology. We focus on 1 aspect of this work that industrial psychologists have been slow to embrace, namely, a new trait model that can be viewed as a maladaptive counterpart to the Big 5. There is a conspicuous absence of work psychology research emerging on this trait model despite important implications for how we understand personality at work. We discuss objections to the trait model in a work context and offer rejoinders that might make researchers and practitioners consider applying this model in their work. We hope to stimulate discussion of this topic to avoid an unnecessary bifurcation in the conceptualization of maladaptive personality between industrial and clinical settings.

Type
Focal Article
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 85 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alotaibi, A. G. (2003). Job burnout among employees in the Kuwaiti civil service and its relationship with Type A personality and intention to leave. Journal of the Social Sciences, 31, 347–385.Google Scholar
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/2010_regs.htmGoogle Scholar
Archer, J., & Webb, I. A. (2006). The relation between scores on the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire and aggressive acts, impulsiveness, competitiveness, dominance, and sexual jealousy. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228.Google Scholar
Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request and accommodation: Can requesters' beliefs disable the American's with Disabilities Act? Academy of Management Review, 26, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). The impact of anticipated social consequences on recurring disability accommodation requests. Journal of Management, 32, 158–179.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). The FFM personality dimensions and job performance: Meta-analysis of meta-analyses. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentz, V. J. (1985, August). A view from the top: A thirty year perspective of research devoted to the discovery, description, and prediction of executive behavior. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Booth-Kewley, S., & Friedman, H. S. (1987). Psychological predictors of heart disease: A quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 343–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2012). How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires. Psychological Methods, 18, 36–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S., & Marchiso, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 268–284.Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/civil-rights-act/Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. (1993). Manual for the schedule for non-adaptive and adaptive personality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). Rationale for a six-domain trait dimensional diagnostic system for personality disorder. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevisions/pages/rationaleforasix-domaintraitdimensionaldiagnosticsystemforpersonalitydisorder.aspGoogle Scholar
Colella, A. J., & Bruyère, S. M. (2010). Disability and employment: New directions for industrial and organizational psychology. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Volume 1: Building and developing the organization (pp. 473–503). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., & Mervielde, I. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 639–657.Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., & Salgado, J. F. (2003). Applied personality psychology: Lessons learned from the IWO field. European Journal of Personality, 17, 123–131.Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B. J., Miller, J., Rolland, J. P., Jung, S. C., Taris, R., … Van Hiel, A. (2009). Assessing personality at risk in personnel selection and development. European Journal of Personality, 23, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fruyt, F., Wille, B., & Furnham, A. (2013). Assessing aberrant personality in managerial coaching: Measurement issues and prevalence rates across employment sectors. European Journal of Personality. doi: 10.1002/per.1911[Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. (2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1165–1180.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: Ten aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Disability Discrimination Act of 1995. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/50/contentsGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, M., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). A five-factor measure of schizotypal personality traits. Assessment, 18, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. 477 F.3d 561 (8th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5, or 3?—Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florey, A. T., & Harrison, D. A. (2000). Responses to informal accommodation requests from employees with disabilities. Multilevel evidence on willingness to comply. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 224–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Hyde, G., & Trickey, G. (2013). Do your dark side traits fit? Dysfunctional personalities in different work sectors. Applied Psychology. doi: 10.1111/apps.12002 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Haimann, C. R., Gilmore, P. L., & Emmer, M. S. (2013). What is an essential function? A review of evidence used to define essential functions. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 16, 33–52.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R. (1992). Fundamental topics in personality disorders: Candidate trait dimensions from lower regions of the hierarchy. Psychological Assessment, 4, 251–259.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The personality psychopathology—five (PSY–5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432–443. doi: 10.1037/a0025830Google Scholar
Hogan, R. (1986). Manual for the Hogan personality inventory. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997/2006). Hogan Development Survey Manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40–51.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2010). Management derailment. American Psychological Association Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 555–575.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., Raskin, R., & Fazzini, D. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Measures of leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.Google Scholar
Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Hough, L. M. (1992). The 'Big Five' personality variables—Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155.Google Scholar
Howard, R., & McMurran, M. (2012). Editorial: Whither research on ‘high-harm’ offenders with personality disorders? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 22, 157–164.Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Yan, X., & Li, Z. (2004). The influence of Type A personality and locus of control upon job satisfaction and mental health among medical staff. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 359–361.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Chapter 20: The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In J. Langan-Fox, C. L. Cooper, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 332–355). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Le Pine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2006). The narcissistic personality: Relationship with inflated self-ratings of leadership and with task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 762–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karraker v. Rent-A-Center. 411 F.3d 831, 833 (7th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Kirkcaldy, B. D., Shephard, R. J., & Furnham, A. F. (2002). The influence of Type A behavior and locus of control upon job satisfaction and occupational health. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1361–1371.Google Scholar
Klimoski, R., & Donahue, L. (1997). HR strategies for integrating individuals with disabilities into the work place. Human Resource Management Review, 7(1), 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimoski, R., & Palmer, S. (1993). The ADA and the hiring process in organizations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 45, 10–36.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., & Eaton, N. (2010). Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: Toward a more complete integration in DSM 5 and an empirical model of psychopathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 97–118.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Clark, L. A., Watson, D., Markon, K. E., Derringer, J., … Livesley, J. W. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., & Kramer, M. (2007). Linking antisocial behavior, substance use, and personality: An integrative quantitative model of the adult externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 645–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, J. B., & Van Velsor, E. (1996). A look at derailment today: North America and Europe. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livesley, W. J. (2001). Commentary on reconceptualizing personality disorder categories using trait dimensions. Journal of Personality, 69, 277–286.Google Scholar
Matthews, K., & Haynes, S. (1986). Type-A behavior pattern and coronary disease risk: Update and critical evaluation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123, 923–959.Google Scholar
McCall, M. W. Jr., Lombardo, M. M., & Morrison, A. M. (1988). Lessons of experience. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2, 139–153.Google Scholar
Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the Comprehensive System. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 548–605. doi: 10.1037/a0029406Google Scholar
Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L., & Hallet, A. J. (1996). A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 322–348.Google Scholar
Millon, T., & Davis, R. D. (1996). The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III. Minnetonka, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. E., Alliger, G. M., & Morfopoulos, R. (1997). Toward an ADA-appropriate job analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007a). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1029–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007b). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, T. L., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1995). Hostility and erosion of marital quality during early marriage. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 601–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Boyle, E. H. Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579. doi: 10.1037/a0025679CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, B. (2002). A quantitative review of the comprehensiveness of the five-factor model in relation to popular personality inventories. Assessment, 9, 188–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995–1027.Google Scholar
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 538.Google Scholar
Perugini, M., & Gallucci, M. (1997). A hierarchical faceted model of the big five. European Journal of Personality, 11, 279–301.Google Scholar
Resick, C. J., Whitman, D. S., Weingarden, S. M., & Hiller, N. J. (2009). The bright-side and the dark-side of CEO personality: Examining core self-evaluations, narcissism, transformational leadership, and strategic influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1365.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., & Jackson, J. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76(6), 1523–1544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolland, J. P., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). The validity of FFM personality dimensions and maladaptive traits to predict negative affects at work: A six-month prospective study in a military sample. European Journal of Personality, 17, 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salgado, J. F. (1998). Big Five personality dimensions and job performance in army and civil occupations: A European perspective. Human Performance, 11, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgado, J. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 323–346.Google Scholar
Salgado, J. F., & Táuriz, G. (2012). The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–28. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.716198Google Scholar
Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review., 23, 1055–1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2004). Refining personality disorder diagnosis: Integrating science and practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1350–1365.Google Scholar
Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., … Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 136–169.Google Scholar
Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Bender, D. S., Dyck, I. R., Stout, R. L., Morey, L. C., … Gunderson, J. G. (2005). Dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: Relationships to functional impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1919–1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., & White, L. A. (2012). Adaptive testing with multidimensional pairwise preference items improving the efficiency of personality and other noncognitive assessments. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 463–487.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2007). Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology, 60, 967–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20, 308–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tromp, N. B., & Koot, H. M. (2010). Dimensions of normal and abnormal personality: Elucidating DSM-IV personality disorder symptoms in adolescents. Journal of Personality, 78, 839–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355–380.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110–130.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2013). Measures to assess maladaptive variants of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wille, B., De Fruyt, F., & De Clercq, B. (2013). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of Five-Factor Model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66, 173–223. doi: 10.1111/peps.12016Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative distinctions in personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 370–379.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–957.Google Scholar
Wu, J., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Reconsidering the dispositional basis of counterproductive work behavior: The role of aberrant personality. Personnel Psychology, 64, 593–626.Google Scholar