Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:21:01.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I-O Psychology Has an Important Role to Play in Gender Differences in Negotiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2018

Chelsea D. Hightower ,
John-Luke McCord ,
Michael Hay ,
Brian G. Doyle  and
Jason L. Harman Open the ORCID record for Jason L. Harman [Opens in a new window]
Chelsea D. Hightower
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University
John-Luke McCord
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University
Michael Hay
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University
Brian G. Doyle
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University
Jason L. Harman*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jason L. Harman, Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A major goal of Gardner, Ryan, and Snoeyink (2018) was to determine what steps are needed moving forward in examining gender representation in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Specifically, on the topic of pay differences, we highlight that gender differences in pay are in part due to differences in negotiation behaviors and/or experiences. Prior research demonstrates that female negotiators receive greater backlash than male negotiators—a possible explanation to why men tend to negotiate more often and more successfully than women (Bowles, Babcock, & Lai, 2007). Based on this evidence, one next step in moving forward should involve providing resources and knowledge to improve negotiation skills and practices specifically aimed at eliminating differences between women and men in both propensity to negotiate and the evaluation/consequences of negotiating.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 398 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequality in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Babcock, L., Gelfand, M., Small, D., & Stayn, H. (2006). Gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations. In De Cremer, D., Zeelenberg, M., Murnighan, J. K., Cremer, D. De, Zeelenberg, M., & Murnighan, J. K. (Eds.), Social psychology and economics (pp. 239–259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Babcock, L., & Laschevar, S. (2003). Women don't ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Birk, S. (2012, April). Negotiation contexts where women outperform men: An expectancy theory. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25–40.Google Scholar
Bloom, M., & Michel, J. G. (2002). The relationships among organizational context, pay dispersion, and managerial turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 33–42.Google Scholar
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84–103.Google Scholar
Eriksson, K. H., & Sandberg, A. (2012). Gender differences in initiation of negotiation: Does the gender of the negotiation counterpart matter? Negotiation Journal, 28 (4), 407–428.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. M., Ryan, A. M., & Snoeyink, M. (2018). How are we doing? An examination of gender representation in I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (3), 369–388.Google Scholar
Goldman, B. M., & Shapiro, D. L. (Eds.). (2012). SIOP organizational frontiers series. The psychology of negotiations in the 21st century workplace: New challenges and new solutions. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Jovanović, M. (2017, March). Finance & development. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2017/03Google Scholar
Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. A. M., Kaschner, T., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2018). Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144 (2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000135Google Scholar
Marks, M., & Harold, C. (2011). Who asks and who receives in salary negotiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (3), 371. doi:10.1002/job.671Google Scholar
Martinelli, V. (2015, October 09). Closing the gender wage gap benefits the economy. Retrieved from https://www.careersingovernment.com/tools/gov-talk/career-advice/on-the-job/closing-the-gender-wage-gap-benefits-the-economy/</BI>>Google Scholar