Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-l9twb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T07:34:39.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Including Science Advocacy in Industrial–Organizational Curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Samuel T. McAbee
Affiliation:
Rice University
Frederick L. Oswald
Affiliation:
Rice University
Eden B. King*
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Tammy D. Allen
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Stephen Stark
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Patrick D. Converse
Affiliation:
Florida Institute of Technology
Lillian T. Eby
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Lisa M. Leslie
Affiliation:
New York University
Rustin D. Meyer
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Steven G. Rogelberg
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Liu-Qin Yang
Affiliation:
Portland State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byrne, Z. S., Hayes, T. L., McPhail, S. M., Hakel, M. D., Cortina, J. M., & McHenry, J. J. (2014). Educating industrial–organizational psychologists for science and practice: Where do we go from here? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives of Science and Practice, 7(1), 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar