Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:08:02.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Performance Management: Take My Golf Game, Please!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Neil M. A. Hauenstein
Neil M. A. Hauenstein*
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 176 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumeister, R. F., & Campbell, W. K. (1999). The intrinsic appeal of evil: Sadism, sensational thrills, and threatened egotism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 210–221. Google Scholar
Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston, TX: Gulf. Google Scholar
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246. Google Scholar
Hauenstein, N. M. A. (1998). Training raters to increase the accuracy and usefulness of appraisals. In Smither, J. (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State-of-the-art methods for performance management (pp. 404–444). San Francisco: Josey Bass. Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1999). Persons and situations: Unique explanatory principles or variability in general principles. In Cervone, D., & Shoda, Y. (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 61–93). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230. Google Scholar
Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 769–783. Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of organizations. New York: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar
Mero, N. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1995). Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and favorableness of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 517–524. Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Pulakos, E., & O’Leary, R. S. (2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 146–164.Google Scholar
Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 113–135. Google Scholar