Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T19:53:20.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facts Are Stubborn Things

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Scott Highhouse
Scott Highhouse*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1985, the U.S. Army commissioned prominent psychologists to investigate the possibility of extending human capabilities using parapsychological techniques (Swets & Bjork, 1990). Influential members of the army were frustrated by the slow pace of advancements in human performance and believed that large gains could be made using methods outside of the mainstream. They believed that things like mental concentration and guided imagery could allow soldiers to walk through walls, view things remotely, and even kill adversaries by staring at them (Ronson, 2005). Not surprisingly, the panel of psychologists concluded that these ideas were without merit. In reviewing the psychologists’ work, Morrison (1988) observed, “Among the most difficult lessons in science is how not to deceive yourself” (p. 109).

Type
Response
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 373 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Bowling Green State University

References

Bernardin, H. J. (1987). Development and validation of a forced-choice scale to measure job-related discomfort among customer service representatives. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 162–173.Google Scholar
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 127–151.10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001Google Scholar
Chorągwicka, B., & Janta, B. (2008). Why is it so hard to apply professional selection methods in business practice? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 355–358.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00062.xGoogle Scholar
Colarelli, S. M., & Thompson, M. (2008). Stubborn reliance on human nature in employee selection: Statistical decision aids are evolutionarily novel. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 347–351.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00060.xGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. D. (2008). Why don’t they learn? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 364–366.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00065.xGoogle Scholar
Freyd, M. (1926). The statistical viewpoint in vocational selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 10, 349–356.Google Scholar
Hammond, K. R., & Adelman, L. (1976). Science, values, and human judgment. Science, 194, 389–396.10.1126/science.194.4263.389Google Scholar
Harrington, A. (1959). Life in the crystal palace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. (2008, April). The irresistible appeal of holistic assessment. Presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Klimoski, R., & Jones, R. G. (2008). Intuiting the selection context. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 352–354.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00061.xGoogle Scholar
Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Some new (and old) suggestions for improving personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 343–346.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00059.xGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. L. (2008). Managers also overrely on tests. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 359–360.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00063.xGoogle Scholar
McGaghie, W. C., & Kreiter, C. D. (2005). Holistic versus actuarial student selection. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17, 89–91.10.1207/s15328015tlm1701_16Google Scholar
Morrison, P. (1988, August). Review of enhancing human performance. Scientific American, 259, 108–109.10.1038/scientificamerican0888-108Google Scholar
Mullins, M. E., & Rogers, C. (2008). Reliance on intuition and faculty hiring. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 370–371.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00067.xGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, J. (2008). Interviewer resistance to structure. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 367–369.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00066.xGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2008). The role of perceptions versus reality in managers’ choice of selection decision aids. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 361–363.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00064.xGoogle Scholar
Prien, E. P., Schippmann, J. S., & Prien, K. O. (2003). Individual assessment: As practiced in industry and consulting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410607539Google Scholar
Ronson, J. (2005). The men who stare at goats. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G. (2007). The very separate world of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 987–1008.10.5465/amj.2007.27151939Google Scholar
Sherden, W. (1998). The fortune sellers: The big business of buying and selling predictions. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Swets, J. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1990). Enhancing human performance: An evaluation of “new age” techniques considered by the U.S. Army. Psychological Science, 1, 85–96.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00074.xGoogle Scholar
Thayer, P. W. (2008). That’s not the only problem. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 372.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00068.xGoogle Scholar
Weekley, J. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar