Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-cpvbf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T01:32:02.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Don’t get bogged down by the backlash

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2024

Traci Sitzmann*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA
Gisella Bassani
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA
Mary Lee Stansifer
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA
*
Corresponding author: Traci Sitzmann; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albert, D., Kreutzer, M., & Lechner, C. (2015). Resolving the paradox of interdependency and strategic renewal in activity systems. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 210234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amis, J., Brickson, S., Haack, P., & Hernandez, M. (2021). Taking inequality seriously. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 431439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Values and organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(4), 436465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2004). The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backstage Capital. (2024). Home. https://backstagecapital.com/ Google Scholar
Bai, X., Ramos, M. R., & Fiske, S. T. (2020). As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 117(23), 1274112749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 4975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bump, P. (2023, January 18). Why “woke” replaced “politically correct. The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/18/woke-cancel-desantis-academics/ Google Scholar
Colella, A., Hebl, M., & King, E. (2017). One hundred years of discrimination research in the Journal of Applied Psychology: A sobering synopsis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 500513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Confessore, N. (2024, January 20). America is under attack”: Inside the anti-D.E.I. crusade. The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/20/us/dei-woke-claremont-institute.html Google Scholar
Croom, A. M. (2015). Slurs and stereotypes for Italian Americans: A context-sensitive account of derogation and appropriation. Journal of Pragmatics, 81, 3651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H. C., & MacRae, S. E. (2023). An anatomy of the British war on woke. Race & Class, 65(2), 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTomaso, N. (2024). Rethinking “woke” and “integrative” diversity strategies: Diversity, equity, inclusion—and inequality. Academy of Management Perspectives, 38(2), 225244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djamba, Y. K., & Kimuna, S. R. (2014). Are Americans really in favor of interracial marriage? A closer look at when they are asked about black-white marriage for their relatives. Journal of Black Studies, 45(6), 528544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2022). Getting to diversity: What works and what doesn’t. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
D’Souza, D. (1991, March). Illiberal education. The Atlantic, 267(3), 5197.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 11051121.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feloni, R. (2021, August 27). The authors of a landmark corporate diversity study highlight the actions business leaders have overlooked for too long. JUST Capital. https://justcapital.com/news/our-separate-ways-ella-bell-smith-and-stella-nkomo-highlight-disparities-for-black-women-in-workplace-and-other-corporate-diversity-shortcomings-08-2021/ Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 11731193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follmer, K. B., Sabat, I. E., Jones, K. P., & King, E. (2024). Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations. Industrial and Orgranizational Psychology, 17.Google Scholar
Garcia, C. E., Arnberg, B., Weise, J., & Winborn, M. (2020). Institutional responses to events challenging campus climates: Examining the power in language. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(4), 345354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, R., & Cartwright, P. (2023). Domestic partner benefits remain popular but present challenges. Mercer, https://www.mercer.com/insights/law-and-policy/domestic-partner-benefits-remain-popular-but-present-challenges/#: Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. B. (1993). Gay rights through the looking glass: Politics, morality, and the trial of Colorado’s amendment 2. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 21, 1057.Google Scholar
Gondo, M. B., & Amis, J. M. (2013). Variations in practice adoption: The roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 229247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Lovelace, J. B. (2018). The role of executive symbolism in advancing new strategic themes in organizations: A social influence perspective. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 110131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Wowak, A. J. (2021). CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 3359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, P., & Raisch, S. (2013). Move to the beat—rhythms of change and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 160184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, H. (1991). The politically correct bypass: Multiculturalism and the public schools. Social Policy, 22(1).Google Scholar
Kunisch, S., Bartunek, J. M., Mueller, J., & Huy, Q. N. (2017). Time in strategic change research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 10051064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A. N. N., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, A., & Melwani, S. (2019). #BlackEmployeesMatter: Mega-threats, identity fusion, and enacting positive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 564591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, A., & Melwani, S. (2022). Am I next?” The spillover effects of mega-threats on avoidant behaviors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 720748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, L. M. (2019). Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 538563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyft. (2019). Lyft inclusion and diversity annual report. Lyft_Diversity_and_Inclusion_Report_2019.pdf (q4cdn.com) Google Scholar
Lyft. (2020). Inclusion, diversity, and racial equity 2020 report, Lyft_Inclusion_Diversity_and_Racial_Equity_2020_Report.pdf (q4cdn.com)Google Scholar
Matlins, S., Young, J., & Jackson-Jolley, A. (2024, June 6). Forbes’ 2023 progress report: Where 11 of America’s top companies stand on diversity and equity goals. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sethmatlins/2023/06/19/forbes-2023-progress-report-where-11-of-americas-top-companies-stand-on-diversity-and-equity-goals/ Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (2023, June 5). U.S. same-sex marriage support holds at 71% high. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/506636/sex-marriage-support-holds-high.aspx.Google Scholar
McIntyre, S. (1992). Backlash against equality: The tyranny of the politically correct. McGill Law Journal, 38, 1.Google Scholar
Nagy, I. K. (2021). Rectifying language? Snarl words and politically incorrect language. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 13(2), 130146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nkomo, S. M., Bell, M. P., Roberts, L. M., Joshi, A., & Thatcher, S. M. (2019). Diversity at a critical juncture: New theories for a complex phenomenon. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 498517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outright Proud. (2024). Pride around the world. https://outrightinternational.org/pride-map Google Scholar
Pallotta, F. (2022). Disney employees are staging walkouts over company’s response to the “Don’t Say Gay” bill. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/16/media/disney-walkout-florida-bill/index.html Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2023, March 1). Gender pay gap in U.S. has not closed in recent years, but is narrower among young workers. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/03/01/gender-pay-gap-facts/sr_23-03-01_gender-wage-gap-2023_01-png/ Google Scholar
Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, D. L. (1993). To reclaim a legacy of diversity: Analyzing the "political correctness" debates in higher education. National Council for Research on Women.Google Scholar
Shipp, A. J., & Richardson, H. A. (2021). The impact of temporal schemata: Understanding when individuals entrain versus resist or create temporal structure. Academy of Management Review, 46(2), 299319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion in organizations: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 12621289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starbucks (2021). EEOC report. EEOC report.https://stories.starbucks.com/uploads/2023/03/SBX230321-EEO-1, https://stories.starbucks.com/uploads/2023/03/SBX230321-EEO-1_2021_Consolidated-Report_2.pdf.Google Scholar
Steinem, G. (1971). Quote on severe opposition and backlash. AZ QUOTES. https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1360038 Google Scholar
Strossen, N. (1992). Thoughts on the controversy over politically correct speech. SMU Law Review, 46, 119.Google Scholar
Thomason, B., Opie, T., Livingston, B., & Sitzmann, T. (2023). Woke” diversity strategies: Science or sensationalism? Academy of Management perspectives, 37(2), 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoroughgood, C. N., Sawyer, K. B., & Webster, J. R. (2021). Because you’re worth the risks: Acts of oppositional courage as symbolic messages of relational value to transgender employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 399421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Labor. (2023). Earnings disparities by race and ethnicity. Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ofccp/about/data/earnings/race-and-ethnicity Google Scholar
Watson, L. M. (2023). The anti-“critical race theory” campaign - classroom censorship and racial backlash by another name. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 58(2), 487549.Google Scholar